· Public charity
Faegre Drinker Foundation
To support the communities served by the law firm of faegre drinker biddle & reath llp by focusing on those organizations that are leaders in providing social, legal, and cultural programs that enrich the experience of the diverse range of people in such communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 27 grants below total $564,733 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $694,192 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $129,459 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $385k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $148k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY | $78,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS | $70,000 |
| FUND FOR LEGAL AID | $47,500 |
| VOLUNTEER LAWYERS NETWORK | $41,000 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS | $41,000 |
| LEGAL AID FOUNDATION OF COLORADO | $28,975 |
| INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES INC | $25,000 |
| IOWA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COUNCIL | $24,042 |
| ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS | $20,000 |
| WALKER ART CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA | $15,000 |
| CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION | $13,509 |
| MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND | $12,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA BAR FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| TUBMAN CENTER | $10,167 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
32 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FUND FOR LEGAL AID8× · 2017–2024 · $393k · revenue +57%
- VLVOLUNTEER LAWYERS NETWORK LTD8× · 2017–2024 · $341k · revenue +101%
- LALegal Aid Foundation of Colorado8× · 2017–2024 · $265k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- HIHIAS INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
- IUINQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +344%
- CFCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The foundation works to defend and promote the constitution of the united states, focusing especially on the first, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and 14th amendments. the foundation also works to defend and promote the constitution of the…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…
The northwest consumer law center zealously advocates, litigates, and promotes access to justice for low and moderate income clients, and through its education programs, empowers consumers with the knowledge and resources to protect their…
To promote equal access to justice and improve the lives of low-income clients through quality legal assistance
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walker Art Center and the most unlike its peers is The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER LAWYERS NETWORK LTD ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado ↗
- Who funds Indiana Legal Services Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Advocates For Human Rights ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PRIVATE COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds Colorado Lawyers Committee ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds INDIANA BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds INQUILINXS UNIDXS POR JUSTICIA- UNITED RENTERS FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds IOWA LAW SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds Erins House for Grieving Children Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE NITA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
- Who funds KOSCIUSKO COUNTY SHELTER FOR ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY HOPE CORPORATION D/B/A MISS VIRGINIA'S FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Eskenazi Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD JUSTICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL MINNESOTA LEGAL SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Fredrikson & Byron Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Dorsey & Whitney Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Minneapolis Foundation · Robins Kaplan Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Equal Justice Works · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Aws Foundation Inc · Perkins Coie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Faegre Drinker Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.