Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2024.

International$8.2MEducation$4.2MArts & Culture$2.3MHealth$2.1MHuman Services$1.6MCommunity Improvement$1.5MPublic Benefit$625kPhilanthropy$500kReligion$100kOther$4.2M
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $348k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+8 grants · $5.7M
$80,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$113M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VITAL VOICES$2,000,000
DOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARES$1,500,000
RAND CORPORATION$625,000
VITAL VOICES$500,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$300,000
CURTIS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$250,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$250,000
MUSEUM OF LANGUAGE ARTS$250,000
BABY2BABY$200,000
THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT$200,000
A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT$200,000
BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE$200,000
CHABAD OF MALIBU$180,000
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$150,000
NEW MILFORD HOSPITAL$125,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $15k → 21%DAYA FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%THE EMPOWERMENT PLAN: $15k → 21%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $10k → 17%LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $750 → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BOWERY RESIDENTS' COMMITTEE: $200k → 17%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION: $50k → 17%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION: $50k → 17%CAREYES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $250k → 17%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $200k → 17%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $200k → 17%LITTLE MISSIONARY'S DAY NURSERY: $49k → 17%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $100k → 17%LITTLE MISSIONARY'S DAY NURSERY: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
DE
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 33 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
36

Total granted

$17M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-15%

Still filing today

79%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalHealthEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7.4M · revenue +4%
  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +16%
  • BR
    BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • SU
    SUPERHUMANS UKRAINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue +259%
  • HR
    HERNIA REPAIR FOR THE UNDERSERVED
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -29% · 94% of their budget
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2022 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
5
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
8
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
9
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
10
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Myriad Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Society of the French Legion of Honor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Affordable Housing Developm…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity Arts CentersChristian Youth CampsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr16%37%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%12%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%47%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/79
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,486

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/75
Grantees still filing
32/75
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,374,328 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INCHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $300,000 · International+6 more — $510,000 · International+6 moreUCLA FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $1,560,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERS…RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $260,000 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOO…+3 more — $113,000 · EducationUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM — $750,000 · OtherUNITED STATES HOLOCAUST …CURTIS SCHOOL — $531,000 · OtherCURTIS SCHOOLCHABAD OF MALIBU — $510,000 · OtherCHABAD OF MALIBUBABY2BABY — $450,000 · OtherBABY2BABYNEW MILFORD HOSPITAL — $450,000 · OtherNEW MILFORD HOSPITALCURTIS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $250,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $250,000 · OtherCHABAD OF GREATER LOS FELIZ — $200,000 · OtherThe Rand Corporation — $625,000 · OtherThe Rand Corporation+33 more — $1,401,195 · Other+33 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $550,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLIT…THE MUSEUM OF LANGUAGE ARTS INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM…BUCK'S ROCK CAMP INC — $420,000 · Arts & CultureBUCK'S ROC…FRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC — $200,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF…VENETIAN HERITAGE INC — $117,710 · Arts & CultureARRAY ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureArt Division — $100,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $293,000 · Arts & Culture+9 moreSUPERHUMANS UKRAINE INC — $1,000,000 · HealthSUPERHUMA…A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT — $770,000 · HealthA NEW WAY…HERNIA REPAIR FOR THE UNDERSERVED — $250,000 · HealthHERNIA RE…+4 more — $40,000 · HealthHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $750,000 · Human ServicesBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $600,000 · Human ServicesBROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesLITTLE MISSIONARY DAY NURSERY — $73,500 · Human Services+5 more — $75,750 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARES — $1,500,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $25,000 · Community Improvement
International$8,184,328Education$4,183,000Other$5,417,195Arts & Culture$2,280,710Health$2,060,000Human Services$1,599,250Community Improvement$1,525,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $7,374,328 over 3y, 11% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $2,250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $1,560,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN SEATTLE CARES — $1,500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSUPERHUMANS UKRAINE INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetA NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT — $770,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $750,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $625,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE INC — $600,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART — $550,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF LANGUAGE ARTS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetBABY2BABY — $450,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBUCK'S ROCK CAMP INC — $420,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $260,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHERNIA REPAIR FOR THE UNDERSERVED — $250,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetCURTIS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KING'S TRUST USA INC — $120,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetVENETIAN HERITAGE INC — $117,710 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARRAY ALLIANCE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSocial Impact Fund — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetArt Division — $100,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMGM RESORTS FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLOONEY FOUNDATION FOR JUSTICE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetTHE MIDDLE EAST PEACE DIALOGUE NETWORK INC — $100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetRE-EARTH INITIATIVE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK AND PINK INC — $80,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetYud Foundation Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLITTLE MISSIONARY DAY NURSERY — $73,500 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetPROVINCETOWN FILM SOCIETYINC — $71,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $48,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOSEPHS ARTS FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetENSEMBLE STUDIO THEATRE INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICERS ASSN INC — $30,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EMPOWERMENT PLAN — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Diller Foundation…Jewish Communal FundThe Brian D Stevens F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…California Community …The Ford FoundationThe New York Communit…The Howard Gilman Fou…National Philanthropi…ImpactassetsincPledgeling FoundationJewish Community Foun…
The Diller Foundation Dba the Diller- Von Furstenberg Family FoundationNY36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Diller Foundation Dba the Diller- Von Furstenberg Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Brian D Stevens Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · California Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · Pledgeling Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Housatonic Valley Association Inc — 38% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Provincetown Film Societyinc — 6% of income from government
  • 20 Summers Inc — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines