· Private foundation
The Brian D Stevens Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k147 grants · $240k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEO Philanthropy Inc | $60,000 |
| America Media | $22,500 |
| Catholic Prison Ministries Coalitio | $10,000 |
| Mount Saint Mary College | $10,000 |
| Order of Malta | $9,872 |
| Awakening Recovery | $6,000 |
| Trevor Project | $5,500 |
| DocWalks4Animals | $5,000 |
| Franciscan Mission Service | $5,000 |
| Eisenhower Health Foundation | $5,000 |
| Meeting Professional International | $4,500 |
| Our Lady of Solitude | $3,860 |
| Holy Trinity Catholic Church | $3,825 |
| Outer Cape Health Services | $3,500 |
| Van Ness Recovery House | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
115 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 72 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $227k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VNVAN NESS RECOVERY HOUSE7× · 2018–2025 · $125k · revenue +92%
- OOOrder of Malta Clinic of Northern California9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +276%
- AFALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AND HEALING3× · 2018–2020 · $63k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- AYATLANTA YOUTH ACADEMYone grant, 2019 · $25k
- EIEVENTS INDUSTRY COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +87%
- AOArchdiocese of Los Angelesone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To provide leadership and professional development, education and research to create workplaces free from discrimination.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Tourism Diversity Matters Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
158 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 158 of the 383 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VAN NESS RECOVERY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Order of Malta Clinic of Northern California ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AND HEALING ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE DBA THE SANCTUARY OF CULTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TOURISM DIVERSITY MATTERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
- Who funds 20 Summers Inc ↗
- Who funds EVENTS INDUSTRY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds AWAKENING RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC PRISON MINISTRIES COALITIO ↗
- Who funds Mount Saint Mary College ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CONRAD N HILTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds US TRAVEL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds OUTER CAPE HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Michael & Patricia Smith Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gramercy Park Foundation Inc · Sovereign Military Order of Malta Western Association-Usa · Klm Foundation · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Rolly Michaux Foundation Inc · The Murray Reese Foundation · Thomas & Dorothy Leavey Foundation · Edward Bangs Kelley and Elza Kelley Foundation Inc · David Bohnett Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Brian D Stevens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Outer Cape Health Services Inc — 18% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Provincetown Film Societyinc — 6% of income from government
- Homeless Prevention Council Inc — 4% of income from government
- 20 Summers Inc — 2% of income from government
- Provincetown Commons Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.