· Private foundation
The Carpenter Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k78 grants · $392k
- $10k–50k38 grants · $558k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY | $25,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY - ROGUE VALLEY DISTRICT COUNCIL | $22,500 |
| SOUTH MEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL | $20,500 |
| JOSEPHINE COMMUNITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ROGUE RETREAT | $20,000 |
| LIVING OPPORTUNITIES | $20,000 |
| NORTH MEDFORD HIGH SCHOOL | $19,500 |
| MASLOW PROJECT | $17,000 |
| CRATER HIGH SCHOOL | $16,500 |
| CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC | $15,000 |
| CIVICS LEARNING PROJECT | $15,000 |
| SCIENCE WORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| SOUTHERN OREGON CHILD & FAMILY COUNCIL | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $452k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
173 repeat relationships — 95 still active in FY2025, 78 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $209k · revenue +96%
- RCROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2024 · $200k · revenue +311%
- SHSCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM8× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- OFOptions for Southern Oregongraduatedone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +73%
- ACARMADILLO COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -27%
- JCJOSEPHINE COMMUNITY LIBRARY DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Engage with diverse constituencies on forest health and wild fire risk projects to support resilient landscapes, thriving communities, wood manufacturing and workforce development
To conserve, enhance and protect the quality and ecological integrity of the watersheds by providing a cooperative forum to promote and facilitate integrated watershed management.
To restore, protect, and build resilient urban tree canopies in Oregon, with a focus on underserved and climate-vulnerable communities. The organization provides tree planting, preservation, education, workforce development, and long-term…
Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Living Opportunities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eugene Debbs Potts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
192 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 192 of the 302 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ROGUE RETREAT ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ↗
- Who funds Civics Learning Project ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SET FREE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON CHILD AND FAMILY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN OREGON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SYMPHONY OF SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds KIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds Josephine Community Library Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SPARTAN BOXING CLUB ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE DREAMS INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON ALLIANCE OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ↗
- Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SOUTHERN OREGON INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Carrico Family Foundation · Four Way Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Careoregon Inc · West Family Foundation · Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Carpenter Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Farmers Market Fund — 100% of income from government
- Klamath Bird Observatory — 100% of income from government
- Applegate Partnership Inc — 100% of income from government
- Illinois Valley Watershed Council — 100% of income from government
- Rogue River Watershed Council — 94% of income from government
- Partnerships in Community Living Inc — 93% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Child and Family Council Inc — 92% of income from government
- Rogue Farm Corps — 91% of income from government
- Living Opportunities Inc — 90% of income from government
- United Community Action Network — 82% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Aspire — 82% of income from government
- Maxs Mission — 77% of income from government
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Hearts With a Mission — 51% of income from government
- Rogue Food Unites — 48% of income from government
- Golden Rule Reentry — 47% of income from government
- Reclaiming Lives — 47% of income from government
- Oregon Spinal Cord Injury Connection — 44% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time — 42% of income from government
- Raices de Bienestar — 41% of income from government
- Illinois Valley Family Coalition — 40% of income from government
- The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery — 38% of income from government
- Butte Falls Community School Partnership — 38% of income from government
- Understory Initiative — 36% of income from government
- Grants Pass Sobering Center Inc — 31% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Climate Action Now — 30% of income from government
- Greater Applegate Community Development — 26% of income from government
- Oregon Lions Sight & Hearing Foundation — 24% of income from government
- College Dreams Inc — 23% of income from government
- Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
- Siskiyou Mountain Club — 22% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Farm to School — 17% of income from government
- Siskiyou Field Institute — 17% of income from government
- The Dome School — 17% of income from government
- Illinois Valley Wellness Resources — 16% of income from government
- Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Rogue Community Health — 13% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- Friends of the Oregon Caves and Chateau — 11% of income from government
- United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
- Anima Mundi Productions — 10% of income from government
- Addictions Recovery Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Barnstormers Theatre — 8% of income from government
- Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ontrack Inc — 7% of income from government
- Craterian Performances Company — 6% of income from government
- Nonprofit Association of Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Wind Ensemble — 6% of income from government
- Youth Symphony of Southern Oregon — 6% of income from government
- Miracle Theatre Group — 6% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Oregon & Sw Washington Inc — 5% of income from government
- White Oak Farm & Education Center — 5% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Repertory Singers — 5% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Historical Society Inc — 4% of income from government
- Options for Southern Oregon — 4% of income from government
- Siskiyou Singers — 4% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Architecture Foundation of Oregon — 4% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Guild — 3% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Film Society Ashland Independent Film Festival — 3% of income from government
- Hope Equestrian Center — 3% of income from government
- Art Presence Inc — 3% of income from government
- Ashland New Plays Festival — 2% of income from government
- Equamore Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Woodland Charter School — 2% of income from government
- Portland Opera Association Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chess for Success — 2% of income from government
- Grants Pass Museum of Art — 2% of income from government
- Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
- Collaborative Theatre Project Inc — 1% of income from government
- Josephine County Food Bank — 1% of income from government
- Young Musicians & Artists Inc — 0% of income from government
- Scienceworks Hands-On Museum — 0% of income from government
- Casa of Jackson County Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Southern Oregon Friends of Hospice — 0% of income from government
- Jackson County Community Services Consortium — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc — 0% of income from government
- Mid Rogue Imaging Center — 0% of income from government
- Healthy U — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Carpenter Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Carpenter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.