· Private foundation
Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of ROBERT AND FRANCES CHANEY FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k31 grants · $155k
- $10k–50k19 grants · $220k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YMCA DBA ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA | $25,000 |
| HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER | $20,000 |
| ASANTE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA | $10,000 |
| SPARTAN BOXING CLUB | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITYROGUE VALLEY | $10,000 |
| ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING | $10,000 |
| SPARROW CLUBS USA | $10,000 |
| CHIRON CENTER INCORPORATED | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF COUNTRY LIVING | $10,000 |
| BUTTE CREEK MILL FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE ROGUE VALLEY | $10,000 |
| JOSEPHINE COUNTY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NORTH VALLEY KNIGHTS BOOSTER CLUB | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $236k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HWHEARTS WITH A MISSION2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +30%
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE TRI-STATE INC2× · 2021–2022 · $14k · revenue +78%
- CBCROSSING BRIDGES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- MVMilton Volunteer Fire Departmentgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +106%
- MPMASLOW PROJECTone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +19%
- AACCESSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Rogue Valley Humane Society provides compassionate care for stray unwanted displaced and abandoned animals and works toward ending pet overpopulation so that there will be no more homeless pets. We are committed to placing every…
Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.
Raphael house of portland is dedicated to ending domestic and sexual violence. we support survivors through emergency and ongoing services, while advancing systemic change through community-based education and collaborative advocacy. we…
A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…
A christian organization compassionately serving youth and families, providing them counseling, mentoring, skill building and education services in safe environment, to support the development of their hope and future.
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
Our mission is to inspire unlimited opportunities for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live the life they choose by providing person-centered supports tailored to the unique needs of each individual.
Restoration House provides save, supervised housing for men with significant behavioral health needs, creating a stable environment where structure, accountability, and wraparound services support personal growth and long-term recovery.…
Our mission is helping people help themselves to lead healthy and productive lives. communiyt outreach, inc.ofeers the most comphrehensiveset of intergrated social services in the mid-williamette valley. we serve an at-risk population of…
To build partnerships among volunteers, families, and the community in order to build simple, decent houses for families in need.
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
To protect children, support families, and bring hope and healing through compassionate, coordinated, and child-centered advocacy, through specialized programs and services, such as multi-disciplinary team coordination, forensic…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Works Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eugene Debbs Potts Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOSEPHINE COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds WALKING TALL SOUTHERN OREGON ↗
- Who funds SPARROW CLUBS USA ↗
- Who funds Milton Volunteer Fire Department ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HEARTS WITH A MISSION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE TRI-STATE INC ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE IMAGES REHABILITATION & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds CROSSING BRIDGES THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DAVIDS CHAIR OUTDOOR MOBILITY SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds North Valley Knights Booster Club ↗
- Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ↗
- Who funds OREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME ↗
- Who funds BUTTE CREEK MILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds YOUTH 71FIVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SPARTAN BOXING CLUB ↗
- Who funds JACKSONVILLE ENGINE CO 1 INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY 4-H FFA JR LIVESTOCK AUCTION COMMITTEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · West Family Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Four Way Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Arthur R Dubs Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · Anna May Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Community Works Inc — 59% of income from government
- Hearts With a Mission — 51% of income from government
- Rogue Valley Mentoring — 42% of income from government
- Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time — 42% of income from government
- Grants Pass Sobering Center Inc — 31% of income from government
- Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
- Youth 71FIVE Ministries — 16% of income from government
- Jackson County Sart — 14% of income from government
- Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ontrack Inc — 7% of income from government
- Hope Equestrian Center — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.