Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS

PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS (Oregon) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $558,252 to it, the largest being THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($348,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.0M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$558k
Net assets
$4.6M
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What Pacifica a Garden in the Siskiyous does

Mission

Pacifica is a unique 400 acre natural reserve dedicated to education and to the celebration of plants, the environment, and the arts throughout the community and beyond.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Education about Environment: offer field trips; summer camps and a unique mobile science-nature center which provides programs to 5,000 K-5th children; interpretive signage on grounds, trails, buildings; Education about Arts: offer classes, summer camp; offer winter and spring Arts Festivals (venues for local artists and musicians).

    $660,523 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $660,523.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($453k) Expenses 100 ($346k) Net assets 100 ($3.1M)2018 Revenue 138 ($623k) Expenses 128 ($443k) Net assets 106 ($3.3M)2019 Revenue 100 ($452k) Expenses 123 ($427k) Net assets 107 ($3.3M)2020 Revenue 107 ($484k) Expenses 93 ($321k) Net assets 112 ($3.5M)2021 Revenue 168 ($761k) Expenses 139 ($480k) Net assets 121 ($3.8M)2022 Revenue 167 ($757k) Expenses 187 ($648k) Net assets 124 ($3.9M)2023 Revenue 216 ($978k) Expenses 189 ($653k) Net assets 140 ($4.4M)2024 Revenue 179 ($811k) Expenses 209 ($725k) Net assets 143 ($4.5M)2025 Revenue 224 ($1.0M) Expenses 239 ($826k) Net assets 149 ($4.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (224)Expenses (239)Net assets (149)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $4.0M to $4.5M (+13%).

$3.3M
$3.3M
$3.4M
$3.5M
$3.8M
$4.0M
$4.5M
$4.6M
$5.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

65% of PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$107k
’17
$181k
’18
$26k
’19
$163k
’20
$281k
’21
$109k
’22
$325k
’23
$86k
’24
$187k
’25
9.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Jayda Wood

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed9887669109
Joined·+1+2+0+0+1+4+1+1
No longer listed·22111102
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $101k → $13k.

4 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 79% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS.

62%
largest funder
80%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 87% · 2019 75% · 2020 49% · 2021 54% · 2022 68% · 2023 75% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

79% of PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $119k that is directly attributable, 87% of it comes from Oregon funders.

OR
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $439k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin18% · above the median
Months of reserve9.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $10k on record.

State$10k
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO NON-GOVERNMENTS$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 15%Fundraising 5%

Governance

9
board members
78%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

43%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS?
PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS (Oregon) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $558,252 to it, the largest being THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($348,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $558,252 in grants to PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS?
THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $348,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PACIFICA A GARDEN IN THE SISKIYOUS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Pacifica a Garden in the Siskiyous →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing