· Private foundation
The Broder Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $53k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $95k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE DIANE FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL | $95,000 |
| SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES | $15,000 |
| WILSHIRE BOULEVARD TEMPLE | $13,070 |
| NO LIMITS FOR DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING CHILDREN | $10,000 |
| PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK | $7,500 |
| MARTHA'S FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $5,000 |
| JHPIEGO | $5,000 |
| THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS | $3,500 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION LOS ANGELES | $2,500 |
| LOS ANGELES LEADERSHIP PRIMARY ACADEMY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DFDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $476k · revenue +98%
- CCLAREMATRIX2× · 2018–2019 · $34k · revenue +76%
- ECEXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2023 · $34k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- TETHE ELLEN FUNDone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -99%
- TKTHE KINTSUGI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…
The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.
To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
The elizabeth glaser pediatric aids foundation (egpaf) is a proven leader in the fight against pediatric hiv/aids and has reached over 33 million pregnant women with services to prevent transmission of hiv to their babies. to date, egpaf…
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life. we work with public school systems, establishing relationship with superintendents, principals, educators, and community partners to…
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pediatric and Family Medical Center Dba Eisner Health and the most unlike its peers is Martha's Farm Animal Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JHPIEGO CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Private School Axis ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds REISENBACH PHILANTHROPIES INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN MENDING HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds GEFFEN PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY ↗
- Who funds Los Angeles Room & Board ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD ↗
- Who funds EVERYBODY DANCE LA ↗
- Who funds THE ELLEN FUND ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES INN ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
- Who funds WESPARK INC ↗
- Who funds PARK CENTURY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Young Eisner Scholars ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Diane and Dorothy Brooks Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Chuck Lorre Family Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Broder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jhpiego Corporation — 65% of income from government
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Broder Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Broder Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.