Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Beth C and Henry E Adams Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$386k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$453kYouth Development$300kHuman Services$260kEducation$245kCrime & Legal$233kRecreation & Sports$113kArts & Culture$105kFood & Nutrition$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $381k
$15,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$33,334
Individual grant recipient$30,000
PROPERTIES WITH PURPOSE INC$27,500
LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN$25,000
AMERICA SCORES - NY$25,000
WYNONA'S HOUSE$25,000
SPARK YOUTH NYC$25,000
CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND$25,000
CURE SEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER$20,000
THE MOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC$20,000
CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE$15,000
THE PATRICK M D'ALISO FOUNDATION$15,000
BROOKLYN BALLET$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CITY LIVING NY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $111k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $20k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO: $1k → 13%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $20k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $15k → 9%CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE: $15k → 9%CITY LIVING NY: $10k → 17%CITY LIVING NY: $10k → 17%SNACK: $10k → 17%VISIONS SERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
PA
NJ
CA
NE
VA
MD
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 27 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$1.8M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+36%

Still filing today

74%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $133k · revenue +35%
  • BB
    BROOKLYN BALLETINC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +193%
  • TC
    THE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +24%
  • BH
    BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • A
    ALTSO
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
5
Associated Medical Schools of New York

Amsny, the statewide consortium of medical schools in new york, works with its academic, scientific, healthcare, patient advocacy and business partners to advance medical education, biomedical research, and healthcare delivery. this unique…

Education
6
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

7
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

8
Alternatives for Children

To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.

9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Little Flower Children Family Services of New York

Little flower is committed to improving the well-being of the children, families, and individuals with developmental disabilities across nyc and long island so they can reach their full potential. little flower transforms caring into…

Human Services
11
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sparkyouth Nyc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dmf Youth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports Booster Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Professional Ballet Compani…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Health CentersVeteran Support ServicesLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…Food Pantries & AssistanceChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%43%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,730

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $133,334 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEIndividual grant recipient — $95,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTHSTAR — $60,000 · OtherNORTHSTARPROPERTIES WITH PURPOSE INC — $52,500 · OtherPROPERTIES WITH PURPOSE INCUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - ENGINEERING COLLEGE — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI - ENGINEERING COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientShark Shootout Charities Inc — $37,500 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC — $25,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA (TRIANGLE) DOWN SYNDROME ALLIANCE — $25,000 · OtherMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC — $60,000 · OtherMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INCTHE WINGMAN FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherTHE WINGMAN FOUNDATION+10 more — $102,000 · Other+10 moreLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $133,000 · Crime & LegalLAWYERS FOR CHILDRE…WYNONA'S HOUSE — $100,000 · Crime & LegalWYNONA'S HOUSEAMERICA SCORES — $65,000 · Crime & LegalAMERICA SCORESSPARKYOUTH NYC INC — $35,000 · Crime & LegalSPARKYOUTH NYC INCTHE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $105,000 · EducationTHE CHILDRENS SC…PATRICK M D'ALISO FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · EducationPATRICK M D'ALIS…COLLEGE FOUNDATION AT DELHI INC — $60,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOUNDATI…STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $40,000 · EducationSTUDENTSPONSOR P…CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER — $97,295 · HealthCURESEARCH FOR…SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · HealthSPECIAL FRIEND…KICKS FOR A CURE INC — $50,000 · HealthKICKS FOR A CU…C & S PATIENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · HealthBROOKLYN BALLETINC — $105,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKLYN …DMF YOUTH INC — $55,000 · Arts & CultureDMF YOUTH…CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesCITY LIVING NY INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesVISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC — $85,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$720,334Crime & Legal$333,000Education$280,000Health$239,795Arts & Culture$160,000Human Services$111,000Food & Nutrition$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $133,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBROOKLYN BALLETINC — $105,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWYNONA'S HOUSE — $100,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER — $97,295 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC — $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPATRICK M D'ALISO FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 5y, 72% of budgetSPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA SCORES — $65,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetMOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC — $60,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCOLLEGE FOUNDATION AT DELHI INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetDMF YOUTH INC — $55,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetKICKS FOR A CURE INC — $50,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSTUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE WINGMAN FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetShark Shootout Charities Inc — $37,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSPARKYOUTH NYC INC — $35,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT'S CREEK CONSERVANCY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetCITY LIVING NY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetC & S PATIENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetSNACK & FRIENDS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Children's Health Fund — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMDRC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BALLETINC
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds WYNONA'S HOUSE
  • Who funds CURESEARCH FOR CHILDREN'S CANCER
  • Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds PATRICK M D'ALISO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF POUGHKEEPSIE INC
  • Who funds AMERICA SCORES
  • Who funds MOLES CHARITABLE FUND INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE FOUNDATION AT DELHI INC
  • Who funds DMF YOUTH INC
  • Who funds KICKS FOR A CURE INC
  • Who funds STUDENTSPONSOR PARTNERS INC
  • Who funds THE WINGMAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Shark Shootout Charities Inc
  • Who funds SPARKYOUTH NYC INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds BRIGHT'S CREEK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds CITY LIVING NY INC
  • Who funds C & S PATIENT EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SNACK & FRIENDS INC
  • Who funds The Children's Health Fund
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE GRADUATES OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY
  • Who funds AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Beth C and Henry E Adams Private Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Beth C and Henry E Adams Private Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Beth C and Henry E Adams Private Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph