Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Beam Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$374k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$655kEducation$588kArts & Culture$288kCrime & Legal$145kInternational$113kEnvironment$50kHuman Services$45kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$75,000
UCLA FOUNDATION BOTANICAL GARDEN$50,000
THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$50,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDERN'S RIGHTS$50,000
HFA GIFT FUND$30,000
UCLA FOUNDATION MOVEMENT DISORDER RESEARCH$20,000
WILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE FUND$20,000
UCLA FOUNDATION PSYCHOLOGY CHAIRS DISCRETIONARY FUND$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
THE CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION$10,000
LOS ANGELES YOUTH ORCHESTRA$5,000
COLLINS AND KATZ YMCA$5,000
SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL$4,500
WE SPARK$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 69% of grant dollars ($2.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 31% that went abroad ($906k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $233k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $60k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $30k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%WE SPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $5k → 14%WE SPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $5k → 14%WE SPARK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER: $5k → 14%WE SPARK: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%RED CROSS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
CA
UT
MD
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 31% of all-years giving ($906k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
OC$906k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 15 repeat orgs$286k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+27%

Still filing today

80%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +162%
  • ML
    MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $205k · revenue +52%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $145k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • UM
    UCLA MOVEMENT DISORDER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • TD
    Teach Democracygraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +201%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
2
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
3
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
4
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
5
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
8
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Actors' Fund of America; the most unlike its peers is Access Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEDARS SINAI FOUNDATION: $225,000 · OtherCEDARS SINAI FOUNDATIONALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $145,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTSUCLA FOUNDATION BOTANICAL GARDEN: $50,000 · OtherUCLA FOUNDATION BOTANICAL GARDENUCLA MOVEMENT DISORDER RESEARCH: $30,000 · OtherCOLLINS AND KATZ YMCA: $30,000 · OtherHFA GIFT FUND: $30,000 · OtherTeach Democracy: $25,000 · Other+12 more: $130,007 · Other+12 moreIndiana University Foundation: $260,000 · EducationIndiana University FoundationUCLA FOUNDATION: $180,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONSIERRA CANYON SCHOOL: $100,000 · EducationSIERRA CANYON SCHOOL+3 more: $35,500 · Education+3 moreWILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE PIONEERS FOUNDATION: $235,000 · HealthWILL ROGERS MOTION P…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $205,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGART…WESPARK INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesWESPARK INCJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $112,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalLos Angeles Youth Orchestra: $18,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA MONICA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 · Civil Rights
Other$665,007Education$575,500Health$370,000Human Services$232,600International$117,500Arts & Culture$25,750Civil Rights$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $260,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE PIONEERS FOUNDATION: $235,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $205,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $145,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $112,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CANYON SCHOOL: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTeach Democracy: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLos Angeles Youth Orchestra: $18,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetWESPARK INC: $17,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetACCESS BOOKS: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL: $8,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA MONICA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNuzzles & Co: $507 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTUESDAY MUSICAL ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WILL ROGERS MOTION PICTURE PIONEERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CANYON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Teach Democracy ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Youth Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds WESPARK INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S TUMOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds THE SHERMAN OAKS NURSERY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA MONICA SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Nuzzles & Co ↗
  • Who funds TUESDAY MUSICAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Beam Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Beam Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beam’s filings →

    More from the funding graph