· Private foundation
The Aufmuth Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k19 grants · $93k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOMAN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ASSISTA | $15,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $10,000 |
| NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION | $10,000 |
| CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE | $10,000 |
| BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | $10,000 |
| SUSTAINABLE CONSERVATION | $10,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $10,000 |
| CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| TREVOR PROJECT | $7,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ILLINOIS | $5,000 |
| RAPE ABUSE INCEST NATIONAL NETWORK | $5,000 |
| LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS EDUCATION FU | $5,000 |
| TRANSLIFELINE | $5,000 |
| BRING CHANGE TO MIND | $5,000 |
| MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSustainable Conservation9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +104%
- MAMISSION ASSET FUND8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +71%
- CACLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- FOFOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYEone grant, 2017 · $30k
- NANATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -33%
- FFAIRVOTEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Palo Alto Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Conservation ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds MISSION ASSET FUND ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE DONNER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds FRESH ENERGY ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Downtown Streets Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds EAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds The Kids Mental Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
- Who funds BRING CHANGE 2 MIND ↗
- Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · The San Francisco Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Tomkat Ranch Educational Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Aufmuth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.