· Private foundation
The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k61 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| SPCA OF WESTCHESTER | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL | $9,000 |
| WESTCHESTER LAND TRUST INC | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CITY MEALS ON WHEELS | $3,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS | $2,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS | $2,000 |
| SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $1,500 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
96 repeat relationships — 52 still active in FY2022, 44 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NWNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION6× · 2017–2022 · $64k · revenue +94%
- SOSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC5× · 2017–2022 · $49k · revenue +2%
Save The Children Federation Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $23k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- TSTHE SEEING EYEINCone grant, 2018 · $6k
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTERgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +28%
- WAWOMEN'S AUXILLARY OF TEMPLE EMANU-ELone grant, 2019 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.
Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.
Protection of animal rights
Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Partnership to End Homelessness Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yorktown Heights Engine Co 1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds WNET ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
- Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds YORKTOWN HEIGHTS ENGINE CO 1 ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT KISCO VOLUNTEER AMBULANC CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER ↗
- Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Austen-Stokes Ancient Americas Foundation Inc · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Farrell Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Cushman School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.