Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2022
63
Grants FY2022
20
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$135kAnimals$116kReligion$80kInternational$55kEnvironment$50kFood & Nutrition$46kHuman Services$37kCivil Rights$32kOther$0
02FY2022 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k61 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL$10,000
SPCA OF WESTCHESTER$10,000
CONGREGATION EMANU-EL$9,000
WESTCHESTER LAND TRUST INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CITY MEALS ON WHEELS$3,000
FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS$2,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$2,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$2,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$2,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$2,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,000
ASPCA$1,500
CITY HARVEST$1,500
FEEDING AMERICA$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 7%PROJECT HOPE CHARITIES: $1k → 13%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100 → 12%AMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS: $1k → 6%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 7%PROJECT HOPE CHARITIES: $1k → 13%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $100 → 12%AMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS: $500 → 6%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 7%PROJECT HOPE CHARITIES: $1k → 13%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%PROJECT HOPE CHARITIES: $1k → 13%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS: $100 → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $2k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $1k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $1k → 9%CONVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%DOROT: $2k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $500 → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $500 → 17%DOROT: $1k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$607k · 96 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

96 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2022, 44 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

96
33

Total granted

$607k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+28%

Still filing today

80%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NW
    NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $64k · revenue +94%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $23k · revenue +21%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SEEING EYEINC
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • WA
    WOMEN'S AUXILLARY OF TEMPLE EMANU-EL
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
6
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
7
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
8
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
11
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Partnership to End Homelessness Inc; the most unlike its peers is Yorktown Heights Engine Co 1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 140 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
105/105
Grantees still filing
80/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $71,200 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANUELWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $17,000 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRESSWNET: $10,500 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $13,000 · Other+67 more: $147,055 · Other+67 moreNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $64,300 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHESTER…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCI…VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $7,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVI…American Heart Association Inc: $7,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S R…MOUNT KISCO VOLUNTEER AMBULANC CORPS INC: $6,000 · HealthCHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC: $5,000 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,500 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 · Health+4 more: $6,000 · HealthSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $49,000 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTE…Wildlife Conservation Society: $9,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservat…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMA…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $7,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIE…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $6,200 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND…Humane World for Animals Inc: $5,000 · AnimalsBIDEAWEE INC: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $4,000 · Animals+16 more: $9,600 · Animals+16 moreSave The Children Federation Inc: $22,524 · InternationalSave The C…COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIV…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…Mercy Ships International: $5,500 · InternationalMercy Ship…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $2,500 · InternationalMercy Corps: $2,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · International+2 more: $1,500 · InternationalTHE SEEING EYE INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesDOROT INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE CHARITIES INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $3,500 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1,500 · Human ServicesAMERICANS HELPING AMERICANS INC: $1,500 · Human Services+3 more: $800 · Human ServicesCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $16,600 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $12,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWestchester Land Trust Inc: $22,500 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Environment+3 more: $2,500 · Environment
Other$258,755Health$119,300Animals$103,300International$57,524Human Services$40,800Food & Nutrition$33,600Environment$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $64,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $49,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $22,524 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $22,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $16,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS: $13,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFeeding America: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $8,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYORKTOWN HEIGHTS ENGINE CO 1: $7,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT KISCO VOLUNTEER AMBULANC CORPS INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDOROT INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIDEAWEE INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF NEW YORK: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE CHARITIES INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $3,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDS OF GREEN CHIMNEYS ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds YORKTOWN HEIGHTS ENGINE CO 1 ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT KISCO VOLUNTEER AMBULANC CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds CHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC ↗
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edwin D Marks Animal FoundationDE15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edwin D Marks Animal Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Austen-Stokes Ancient Americas Foundation Inc · Grace and Li Yu Family Foundation · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · Farrell Family Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Synchrony Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Cushman School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Ann Coleman Poll Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 140 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann Coleman Poll’s filings →

More from the funding graph