· Private foundation
The 1830 Family Foundation 2138-00-42
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k62 grants · $213k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $463k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $325k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Greenwich Boys and Girls Club | $125,000 |
| Vero Beach Museum of Art | $50,000 |
| The Franklin Institute | $50,000 |
| The Zoological Society of Philadelphia | $50,000 |
| Phillies Charities Inc | $50,000 |
| WINGS WorldQuest | $30,000 |
| Sharing Excess | $27,500 |
| The Barnes Foundation | $25,000 |
| Philadelphia Outward Bound School | $25,000 |
| National Audubon Society | $25,000 |
| Beth Brunswick Memorial Fund for Childre | $25,000 |
| Nurturing Minds Inc | $25,000 |
| Museum of the American Revolution | $25,000 |
| American Rivers Inc | $25,000 |
| Project HOME | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH4× · 2021–2025 · $173k · revenue +119%
- NMNURTURING MINDS INC4× · 2021–2025 · $103k · revenue +50%
- WWWings World Quest Inc3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- IRINDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INCone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue -10%
- FPFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- PMPHILADELPHIA MIDDLE COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
We improve quality of life by enhancing and stewarding pittsburgh's parks in partnership with the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbor to Neighbor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fishers Island Conservancy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
107 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 107 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH ↗
- Who funds NURTURING MINDS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds Wings World Quest Inc ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE'S LIGHT & THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds SHARING EXCESS ↗
- Who funds FAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIES CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds RANGELEY LAKES HERITAGE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds PETER'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds Girls With Impact Inc ↗
- Who funds DMAX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BAKER INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds Legacy Youth Tennis And Education Inc ↗
- Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDENT CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LAUREL HILL AND WEST LAUREL HILL CEMETERIES ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETH BRUNSWICK MEMORIAL FUND FOR CH ↗
- Who funds NEED IN DEED ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Hamilton Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The 1830 Family Foundation 2138-00-42 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- Barbaras House Inc — 17% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich — 7% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Lawrence Memorial Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.