Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Texoma Community Foundation

To improve the health and well-being of our neighbors in the communities that we serve in oklahoma and texas.

$4.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
59
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$873k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 56% of TEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 59 grants below total $3,991,179 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,234,879 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $243,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $944k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $693k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$87M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND$872,813
CITY OF DENISON TX$793,519
REGION 10 EDUCATION SERVICE C$353,369
COMMUNITY WELL TEXAS$324,802
OPEN ARMS SHELTER$170,000
CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTE$118,215
GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC$109,500
GRAYSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION$75,444
FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENT$65,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB RED RIVER$55,000
CRISIS CONTROL CENTER$50,000
FANNIN COUNTY JUVENILE SERVIC$50,000
GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION$45,490
HEALTHY MINDS POLICY INSTITUT$42,100
HOGG FOUNDATION$41,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $782k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SERVE DENTON CENTER INC: $40k → 8%TEXOMA FAMILY SHELTER: $15k → 11%MADILL COMMUNITY DAY CARE: $15k → 16%JUSTIN COWBOY CRISIS FUND INC: $25k → 9%CELEBRITY FIGHT NIGHT FOUNDAT: $10k → 11%CITY SQUARE: $10k → 14%CRISIS CONTROL CENTER: $71k → 16%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CH: $41k → 16%WILLIAMSON COUNTY HOMELESS AL: $10k → 4%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CH: $30k → 16%CRISIS CONTROL CENTER: $50k → 16%CRISIS CONTROL CENTER: $50k → 16%CRISIS CONTROL CENTER: $35k → 16%FOSTER VILLAGE NORTH TEXAS: $59k → 14%BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 16%BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $23k → 16%BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 16%BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 16%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS C: $35k → 14%HOFMAN MRAZ CARE HOME: $26k → 14%FANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS C: $25k → 14%FOSTER VILLAGE NORTH TEXAS: $21k → 14%MASTERKEY MINISTRIES: $14k → 11%MASTERKEY MINISTRIES: $12k → 11%MASTERKEY MINISTRIES: $12k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY WOMENS CRISIS: $40k → 11%FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC: $30k → 11%GRAYSON COUNTY CHILD WELFARE: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 58 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

58 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

58
54

Total granted

$16M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+4%

Still filing today

81%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    OPEN ARMS SHELTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $619k · revenue +203% · 58% of their budget
  • ID
    IMAGINE DURANT INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $610k · revenue +148% · 65% of their budget
  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $594k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • RH
    Ranching Heritage Association
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +20%
  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +10%
  • OT
    OPRY TRUST FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

Healthy Family Services of Texas is dedicated to promoting the physical, mental, and emotional health of our patients by offering comprehensive healthcare services and wellness programs.

Health
4
Texas Center for Child and Family Studies

To strengthen the lives of children and families.

Human Services
5
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
6
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
7
Family Abuse Center Inc

The family abuse center exists to eliminate domestic violence in central texas by sheltering victims of domestic violence and by preventing abuse from occurring through intervention and education.

Human Services
8
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
9
Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
11
Genesis Center North Texas Inc

Shelter for homeless and abused women and children.

Housing & Shelter
12
Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Five Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersCommunity Food PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…United Way AffiliatesYouth Sports ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…School District FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Elementary Literacy TutoringAffordable Housing Construc…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%6%<5yr16%13%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%21%<5yr16%21%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr10%10%35–55yr13%19%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 21% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%1/124
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,680

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
103/105
Grantees still filing
56/105
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF DENISON TX — $5,554,633 · OtherCITY OF DENISON TXFANNIN COUNTY — $1,370,000 · OtherFANNIN COUNTYIMAGINE DURANT INC — $610,000 · OtherIMAGINE DURANT INCREGION 10 EDUCATION SERVICE C — $578,871 · Other+69 more — $2,980,166 · Other+69 moreGREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC — $927,003 · HealthGREATER TEXOMA HEALT…SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND — $872,813 · HealthSWEET RELIEF MUSICIA…CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA — $593,868 · HealthCHILD AND FAMILY GUI…COMMUNITY WELL TX — $324,802 · HealthCOMMUNITY WELL TXTEXOMA BEHAVORIAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP TEAM — $197,500 · HealthTEXOMA BEHAVORIAL HE…+15 more — $524,950 · Health+15 moreGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $432,443 · EducationAUSTIN COLLEGE — $339,050 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC — $327,340 · EducationSOUTHEASTERN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationDENISON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $70,450 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $50,000 · Education+1 more — $20,000 · EducationOPEN ARMS SHELTER — $618,697 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF ELI INC — $166,000 · Housing & ShelterGEARY GIRLS RANCHNORTH dba GEARY FOSTER FOUNDATIONS — $151,600 · Housing & ShelterNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $70,000 · Housing & ShelterCompassionate Hands Inc — $65,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterCRISIS CONTROL CENTER — $206,185 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $88,000 · Human ServicesTHE ISAIAH CLOSET INC dba FOSTER VILLAGE NORTH TEXAS — $79,624 · Human ServicesGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc — $73,000 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $70,345 · Human ServicesFANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $60,000 · Human ServicesSERVE DENTON CENTER INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesMASTERKEY MINISTRIES OF GRAYSON COUNTY — $37,500 · Human Services+9 more — $160,750 · Human ServicesFANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $357,600 · Civil RightsCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $122,300 · Civil RightsBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DURANT — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Club of Denison Texas — $98,167 · Youth DevelopmentGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $96,810 · Youth DevelopmentFANNIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $49,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA INC — $35,000 · Youth Development
Other$11,093,670Health$3,440,936Education$1,339,283Housing & Shelter$1,091,297Human Services$915,404Civil Rights$479,900Youth Development$394,477

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC — $927,003 over 7y, 11% of budgetSWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND — $872,813 over 1y, 34% of budgetOPEN ARMS SHELTER — $618,697 over 4y, 58% of budgetIMAGINE DURANT INC — $610,000 over 4y, 65% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA — $593,868 over 7y, 7.9% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $432,443 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetFANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $357,600 over 7y, 6.7% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE — $339,050 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC — $327,340 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetCRISIS CONTROL CENTER — $206,185 over 4y, 11% of budgetTEXOMA BEHAVORIAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP TEAM — $197,500 over 7y, 27% of budgetHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $169,150 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSE OF ELI INC — $166,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetGEARY GIRLS RANCHNORTH dba GEARY FOSTER FOUNDATIONS — $151,600 over 4y, 22% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC — $140,262 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetDIVINE EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $139,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $122,300 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DURANT — $115,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetGrace Sober Living — $110,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetJ127 Ministry Inc — $104,398 over 6y, 15% of budgetRanching Heritage Association — $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOPRY TRUST FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Denison Texas — $98,167 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $96,810 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetYOUR HEALTH CLINIC — $88,400 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $88,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers — $85,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH TEXAS DENTAL SOCIETY — $80,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetTHE ISAIAH CLOSET INC dba FOSTER VILLAGE NORTH TEXAS — $79,624 over 2y, 33% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC — $79,250 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetGrayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc — $73,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SHERMAN INC — $72,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetDENISON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $70,450 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC — $70,345 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNASHVILLE SAFE HAVEN FAMILY SHELTER INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHearts2Honduras Inc — $70,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetOKLAHOMA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCompassionate Hands Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC — $60,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetEAST CENTRAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFANNIN COUNTY FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP MUSIC — $50,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWEST AFRICA FISTULA CENTER FOUNDATI — $50,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetFANNIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $49,500 over 2y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds IMAGINE DURANT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY WELL TX ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS CONTROL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TEXOMA BEHAVORIAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP TEAM ↗
  • Who funds HOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF ELI INC ↗
  • Who funds GEARY GIRLS RANCHNORTH dba GEARY FOSTER FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIVINE EQUINE THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DURANT ↗
  • Who funds Grace Sober Living ↗
  • Who funds J127 Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ranching Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds OPRY TRUST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Denison Texas ↗
  • Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUR HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BIG FIVE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS DENTAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE ISAIAH CLOSET INC dba FOSTER VILLAGE NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clara B & W Aubrey Sm…United Way of Grayson…Elias & Hanna Regensb…W B Munson Foundation…The Oliver Dewey Mayo…Texoma Medical Center…Wilson N Jones Commun…Texas Instruments Fou…Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce …Dorset Foundation Inc…Thelma Braun & Bockle…Glaser Family Charita…
Clara B & W Aubrey Smith CharitableTX40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson · Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation · Glaser Family Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Texoma Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Big Five Community Services Inc — 75% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Lighthouse Behavioral Wellness Centers — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texoma Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Texoma Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines