· Private foundation
Glaser Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k50 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER | $21,657 |
| CHISOLM HEIGHTS BAPTIST CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CWTX | $8,244 |
| TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY | $6,500 |
| CREATIVE ARTS CENTER | $5,000 |
| CULTIV8COMMUNITY | $5,000 |
| EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY | $4,800 |
| OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY | $4,200 |
| AUSTIN COLLEGE | $4,000 |
| PARIS JR COLLEGE | $2,500 |
| GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE | $2,300 |
| SOUTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY | $2,100 |
| KOOL LUNCH PROGRAM | $2,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $2,000 |
| LANE OF ROSES | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
78 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAUSTIN COLLEGE6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +8%
- DBDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +31%
- GHGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- USUT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2020 · $5k
- EBECTOR BEAUTIFICATION ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2024 · $4k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-DALLASone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.
John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…
The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."
The mission of hardin-simmons university is to be a community dedicated to providing excellence in education enlightened by christian faith and values.
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.
Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.
Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin College and the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 283. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY WELL TX ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Cultiv8Community ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds LANE OF ROSES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXOMA REGIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EXPRESSIONS OF EMMANUEL INC ↗
- Who funds ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS SHELTER ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Higher Education Foundation · Texoma Community Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · M W and Fair Miller Foundation Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Jack and Charlotte Owen Education Scholarship · Thurman Crawford Charitable Trust · The Buddy Bostick Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glaser Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- Norwich University — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.