How much does Texoma Community Foundation give?

Texoma Community Foundation reported 59 itemized grants totaling $3,991,179, out of $4,234,879 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 29 and 60 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.

What does Texoma Community Foundation fund?

By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (30%), Health (27%), Education (10%).

Who are Texoma Community Foundation's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: City of Denison Tx ($5.6M), Fannin County ($1.4M), Greater Texoma Health Clinic ($927k).

Does Texoma Community Foundation fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 35% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Texoma Community Foundation?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable, United Way of Grayson County Inc, Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation.

Where is Texoma Community Foundation based?

Texoma Community Foundation is based in TX.

Texoma Community Foundation

Texoma Community Foundation at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Community foundation

Texoma Community Foundation

To improve the health and well-being of our neighbors in the communities that we serve in oklahoma and texas.

$4.2M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$873k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$5.7MHealth$5.1MEducation$2.0MHuman Services$1.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MHousing & Shelter$925kArts & Culture$450kYouth Development$433kOther$0

02FY2025 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 59 grants below total $3,991,179, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,234,879 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $243,700 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k46 grants · $944k
$50k–250k8 grants · $693k
$250k+4 grants · $2.3M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$87M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
SWEET RELIEF MUSICIANS FUND	$872,813
CITY OF DENISON TX	$793,519
REGION 10 EDUCATION SERVICE C	$353,369
COMMUNITY WELL TEXAS	$324,802
OPEN ARMS SHELTER	$170,000
CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTE	$118,215
GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC	$109,500
GRAYSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION	$75,444
FANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENT	$65,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB RED RIVER	$55,000
FANNIN COUNTY JUVENILE SERVIC	$50,000
CRISIS CONTROL CENTER	$50,000
GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION	$45,490
HEALTHY MINDS POLICY INSTITUT	$42,100
HOGG FOUNDATION	$41,600

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $782k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$16M · 58 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

58 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$16M

$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%

+4%

Still filing today

81%

72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OA
OPEN ARMS SHELTER
4× · 2022–2025 · $619k · revenue ×16 · 58% of their budget
ID
IMAGINE DURANT INC
4× · 2019–2022 · $610k · revenue +148% · 65% of their budget
CA
CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA
7× · 2019–2025 · $594k · revenue +19%

Funded once

RH
Ranching Heritage Association
one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +20%
CI
CHILDHELP INC
one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +10%
OT
OPRY TRUST FUND INC
one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal

Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services

Healthy Family Services of Texas Inc

Healthy Family Services of Texas is dedicated to promoting the physical, mental, and emotional health of our patients by offering comprehensive healthcare services and wellness programs.

Health

Texas Center for Child and Family Studies

To strengthen the lives of children and families.

Human Services

East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—

Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development

Family Abuse Center Inc

The family abuse center exists to eliminate domestic violence in central texas by sheltering victims of domestic violence and by preventing abuse from occurring through intervention and education.

Human Services

Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights

Health Services of North Texas Inc

Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…

Health

Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal

Genesis Center North Texas Inc

Shelter for homeless and abused women and children.

Housing & Shelter

Texas Foster Care & Adoption Serv

A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.

Human Services

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Five Community Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

103/105

Grantees still filing

56/105

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$11,093,670Health$3,440,936Education$1,339,283Housing & Shelter$1,091,297Human Services$915,404Civil Rights$479,900Youth Development$394,477

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clara B & W Aubrey Smith CharitableTX40.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson · Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation · Glaser Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Texoma Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Texoma Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

1rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Texoma Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Texoma Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Texoma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home