· Private foundation
Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GTGREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC3× · 2024–2026 · $45k · revenue 0%
- HOHOUSE OF ELI INC2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +182%
- GHGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- FRFOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INCone grant, 2025 · $15k · revenue +15%
- TSTHE SHERMAN MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $12k · revenue +61%
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy counseling
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.
Assisting in the growth and development of the College Station community in the areas of employment health care housing and counseling.
To provide services designed to meet the physical, social, and emotional needs of domestic violence and sexual assault victims by providing for immediate, short, and long-term needs.
To alleviate financial crisis and provide a medical home to the underserved. Strive to ensure that no one in Rockwall County goes to bed hungry, or without a roof overhead, or is deprived of needed medical care.
Assist residents and transients of Smith County with basic needs, including food, clothing, and emergency utility assistance
To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
Child Advocacy
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Provide health, dental and behavioral health care services along with educational information on these services to the local community and indigent citizens of ellis county, texas and surrounding areas regardless of ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Grayson County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Sherman Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER TEXOMA HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds FOUR RIVERS OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF ELI INC ↗
- Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHERMAN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENISON HELPING HANDS ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT ACTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SHE SUPPLY ↗
- Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUR HEALTH CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Texoma Community Foundation · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson · Thelma Braun & Bocklett Family Foundation · Texoma Medical Center Volunteers · Tr Uw Minnie M Jones · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.