· Public charity
Texoma Medical Center Volunteers
Undertake activities that promote health and health related education of individuals residing in north Texas and southern Oklahoma and collaborate with hospital to provide assistance to departments (non-revenue producing) in their functions and delivery of patient care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $134,832 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $138,472 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,640 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAYSON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC | $26,000 |
| SHARE MINISTRIES INC | $20,540 |
| CHILD & FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER | $20,000 |
| HOUSE OF ELI | $15,000 |
| PVES FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| TEXAS ASSN OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS | $13,000 |
| BARNABAS CENTER | $9,600 |
| DENISON SOUP KITCHEN | $5,692 |
| CIVIL AIR PATROL | $5,000 |
| WOMEN ROCK | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $152k · revenue +177%
- CACHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +33%
- TATEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS7× · 2018–2024 · $61k · revenue +199% · 63% of their budget
Funded once
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -4%
- GCGRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTIONone grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue -30%
- HHHOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC3× · 2019–2021 · $10k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.
To provide for children in the custody of the Texas Department of Regulatory Services.
CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates) of Grayson County is a non-profit organization dedicated to training and equipping our community to protect children, empower families, and advocate for positive outcomes for children involved in…
To assist sexual assault and domestic violence victims. To operate a safe shelter and provide counseling services.
To provide shelter to abused families.
The mission of Grand Central Station is to help reduce the effects of limited resources for those in need, by providing a soup kitchen, a choice food pantry, and children's meal packages for the weekends during the school year. GCS also…
Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.
A state of texas licensed foster care and adoption agency that identifies and provides approved healing foster homes for children.
The denison service league is an organization of women whose mission is to advance women's leadership for meaningful community impact through volunteer action, collaboration and training.
End homelessness in East Texas, & Community Collaboration
Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance
Assist residents and transients of Smith County with basic needs, including food, clothing, and emergency utility assistance
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texoma Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Locust Community Volunteer Fire Dep. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER OF TEXOMA ↗
- Who funds SHARE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE VOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds PVES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF ELI INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN ROCK INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY SENIOR NUTRITION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRAYSON COUNTY JUVENILE ALTERNATIVES INC NORTH TEXAS YOUTH CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds HOME HOSPICE OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LOCUST COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEP ↗
- Who funds Grayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER SERVICES COUNCIL OF TEXOMA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Texoma Family Shelter ↗
- Who funds HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT ACTION TEAM ↗
- Who funds TEXOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENISON SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CIVIL AIR PATROL INC ↗
- Who funds DENISON HELPING HANDS ↗
- Who funds DENISON ANIMAL WELFARE GROUP DAWG ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texoma Community Foundation · United Way of Grayson County Inc · Clara B & W Aubrey Smith Charitable · Texas Instruments Foundation · Sherman Service League · Wilson N Jones Community Foundation · Elias & Hanna Regensburger Foundation · The Oliver Dewey Mayor Foundation · Dr & Mrs Paul Pierce Memorial Foundation · W B Munson Foundation Xxxxx5008 · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Dorset Foundation Inc Attn Marty Sanderson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texoma Medical Center Volunteers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.