· Private foundation
Teb Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB | $50,000 |
| CHAMBERLAIN BALLET | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| TRAFFICK911 | $15,000 |
| BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE | $10,000 |
| BRIDGES TO LIFE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of Teb Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in OK; read by stated purpose it is 16% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC7× · 2017–2023 · $158k · revenue +69%- PAPathways Adult Learning Center Inc4× · 2018–2022 · $71k · revenue ×14
- D2DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC2× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- APAsha Partnersone grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +9%
- KAKING'S ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +40%
- OCOne CommunityUSAone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.
Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…
Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.
To promote positive behavioral health and independence for individuals and families suffering from drug abuse, addiction, criminal behavior, and mental illness.
Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.
The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…
Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.
Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.
The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…
To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault
Provide rehabilitation services and guidance to follow Christian principles to restore teens and young adults sufferning from addictions and trauma and ultimately placing them back into society as positive contributors
To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council and the most unlike its peers is Trinity River Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNCHARTED MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds THE MAGDALEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
- Who funds 29 ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Asha Partners ↗
- Who funds PEDIPLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMBERLAIN BALLET ↗
- Who funds KING'S ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds One CommunityUSA ↗
- Who funds TRINITY RIVER MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
- Who funds Traffick911 ↗
- Who funds FAMILY GATEWAY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE SUPPLY CO ↗
- Who funds TULSA BOYS' HOME INC ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WELL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO LIFE ↗
- Who funds HOME POINT ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Hattie Mae Lesley Foundation Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teb Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Teb Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Teb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.