Skip to content
Taxman Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Taxman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.3MEducation$769kReligion$625kHealth$431kHuman Services$412kPhilanthropy$180kArts & Culture$93kRecreation & Sports$81kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $335k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES$1,150,000
THE HELPING HANDS NETWORK$135,000
THE NEW REFORM CONGREGATION KADIMA$100,000
GIRF$100,000
THE ARK$35,000
AUDITORIUM THEATRE$27,500
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY$25,000
KESHET$15,000
REPAIR THE WORLD INC$15,000
NICKLAUS CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,500
GLENKIRK$5,000
FRIEND OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FUND$5,000
LES TURNER ALS FOUNDATION$5,000
CURES WITHIN REACH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILDHELP: $10k → 11%VETERANS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $100 → 13%CHILDHELP: $8k → 11%CHILDHELP: $5k → 11%CHILDHELP: $5k → 11%CHILDHELP: $5k → 11%CHILDHELP: $3k → 11%GLENKIRK: $6k → 14%GLENKIRK: $5k → 14%GLENKIRK: $5k → 14%GLENKIRK: $5k → 14%GLENKIRK: $5k → 14%GLENKIRK: $5k → 14%GLENKIRK: $3k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $10k → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
MO
AZ
KS
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 43 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
18

Total granted

$4.2M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+5%

Still filing today

53%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $767k · revenue +392%
  • K
    KESHET
    3× · 2019–2025 · $120k · revenue +44%
  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TO
    TWIN ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +5%
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS GOLF CO TWIN ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • IB
    I BELONG
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
3
Miami Jewish Health Systems Inc

Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…

Human Services
4
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
5
Chelsea Jewish North Shore Assisted Living Inc

To enrich the life of each of our residents and program participants so that each may continue to live his or her life with a sense of meaning and purpose. we provide assisted living units for our tenants.

Housing & Shelter
6
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
7
Jgs Lifecare Corporation

Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.

Health
8
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
11
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
12
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camp for All Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/35
Grantees still filing
24/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIRF: $1,405,000 · OtherGIRFTHE ARK: $355,000 · OtherTHE ARKNEW REFORM CONGREGATION KADIMA: $250,000 · OtherNEW REFORM CONGREGATION KADIMAJUF: $123,000 · OtherKESHET: $120,000 · Other+38 more: $707,378 · Other+38 moreMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,150,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE P…Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $15,000 · Food & NutritionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $767,436 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER …+1 more: $2,000 · EducationHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC: $328,300 · Youth DevelopmentCamp for All Kids: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $125,000 · PhilanthropyIbis Charities Foundation Inc: $39,000 · PhilanthropyHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropySweet Dream Makers Inc: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyJupiter Medical Center Inc: $60,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthPEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthCHILDHELP INC: $35,500 · Human ServicesGlenkirk: $34,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $15,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human Services
Other$2,960,378Food & Nutrition$1,215,000Education$769,436Youth Development$368,300Philanthropy$199,500Health$91,500Human Services$89,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $1,150,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $767,436 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetHELPING HANDS NETWORK INC: $328,300 over 6y, 39% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKESHET: $120,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLyme Disease Association Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetCamp for All Kids: $40,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetREPAIR THE WORLD: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIbis Charities Foundation Inc: $39,000 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetTWIN ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB: $37,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGlenkirk: $34,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetI C A R E Dog Rescue: $18,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetHAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAuditorium Theatre of Roosevelt University Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSweet Dream Makers Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY SUPPORT TEAM INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFocus on the Arts Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS IN NEED FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Lyme Disease Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Camp for All Kids ↗
  • Who funds REPAIR THE WORLD ↗
  • Who funds Ibis Charities Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TWIN ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC ↗
  • Who funds Glenkirk ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds I C A R E Dog Rescue ↗
  • Who funds HAROLD E EISENBERG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bill Bass Foundat…Jewish Federation of …American Gift FundMorgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…American Online Givin…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bill Bass FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bill Bass Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · American Gift Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Taxman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Taxman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Taxman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home