· Private foundation
Sulentic Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $215k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $286k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORNERSTONE BAPTIST CHURCH | $105,514 |
| DALLAS WIND SYMPHONY | $60,000 |
| CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE | $60,000 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER | $25,000 |
| BAYLOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC | $25,000 |
| HEROES AND HORSES INC | $20,000 |
| EO WILSON BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| KHAN ACADEMY INC | $20,000 |
| COUNCIL BLUFFS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| TREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS | $10,000 |
| IN THE CITY FOR GOOD | $10,000 |
| HOLY INNOCENTS CHILDRENS MALARIA HOSPITAL UGANDA I | $10,000 |
| ST ALBERT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $368k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
34 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DWDALLAS WIND SYMPHONY5× · 2020–2024 · $285k · revenue +27%
- CCCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $260k · revenue +70%
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2024 · $210k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- BEBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -5%
- CTCircuit Trail Conservancyone grant, 2020 · $83k · revenue -9%
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.
The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.
Trec's mission is to cultivate relationships in the commercial real estate industry to catalyze community investment, influence policy, propel careers and develop the leaders of tomorrow.we believe relationships are the lifeblood of career…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.
To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cbre Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CBRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS WIND SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEROES AND HORSES INC ↗
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Circuit Trail Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds EO WILSON BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Holy Innocents Childrens Hospital Uganda Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds 4WORD ↗
- Who funds IN THE CITY FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Community Empowerment ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL COMMUNITY OUTREACH OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds HILLCREST HIGH SCHOOL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OUT TEACH ↗
- Who funds FERGUSON ROAD INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL BLUFFS SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHOT ↗
- Who funds TREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY DALLAS HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Addy Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sulentic Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.