Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steve & Desiree Ralph Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$51kHealth$50kHousing & Shelter$21kArts & Culture$20kHuman Services$17kAnimals$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kEnvironment$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEALS ON WHEELS$3,000
THE BANK HEAD BOTH WELL$3,000
ALAMEDA COUNTY FOOD BANK$2,000
99 PLEDGES$1,650
FOOD BANK CONTRA COSTA SOLANO$1,061
JOHN TOLAND VOCAL ARTS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
FESTIVAL OF ARTS$1,000
ST JUDE$1,000
LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE$518
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$500
CHILDRENS HEALTH GUILD$185
ALZHEIMERS ASSOC$120
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $1k → 9%HOPE HOSPICE: $1k → 10%HOPE HOSPICE: $1k → 10%HOPE HOSPICE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$118k · 19 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$118k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+74%

Still filing today

37%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OH
    OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +295%
  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +112%
  • AM
    ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AC
    ALS CURE PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $16k
  • TW
    THE WARRIORS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • RC
    REDWOOD COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Open Hand

Project Open Hand's mission is to improve health outcomes and quality of life by providing nutritious meals to the sick and vulnerable, caring for and educating our community.

Food & Nutrition
2
Meals on Wheels by Acc

Our mission is to serve nutritious meals with a friendly smile to seniors in Sacramento County.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
6
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
7
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
8
Meals On Wheels of San Francisco Inc

To provide isolated homebound seniors in san francisco with nutritious meals, daily human contact, and supportive services to prevent their premature institutionalization.

—
9
Teen Kitchen Project

The mission of teen kitchen project (tkp) is to build healthier, more connected communities by engaging teens and providing nutritious food to individuals living with serious illnesses.

Youth Development
10
Bay Area Cancer Connections

Bay area cancer connections mission is to support anyone affected by breast or ovarian cancer with personalized services that inform and empower.

Health
11
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
12
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is League to Save Lake Tahoe. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALS CURE PROJECT: $16,000 · OtherALS CURE PROJECTALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15,000 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKST JUDE: $11,500 · OtherST JUDEMEALS ON WHEELS: $10,585 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSTHE WARRIORS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTHE WARRIORS FOUNDATIONTRI VALLEY HAVEN: $9,000 · OtherTRI VALLEY HAVENIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherLIVERMORE VALLEY PERFORMING ARTS CE: $5,400 · OtherREDWOOD COMMUNITY FUND: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5,000 · OtherFESTIVAL OF ARTS: $4,940 · Other+26 more: $36,492 · Other+26 moreOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $18,225 · Food & NutritionOPEN HEART KITCH…ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionALAMEDA MEALS ON…MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $2,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS …FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,061 · Food & NutritionHOPE HOSPICE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $1,000 · Human ServicesHARMONY & HEALING: $3,200 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY: $2,089 · AnimalsShepherds Gate: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTRI-VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL DBA VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $1,804 · Education
Other$140,917Food & Nutrition$26,286Human Services$4,000Arts & Culture$3,200Animals$2,089Housing & Shelter$2,000Education$1,804

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC: $18,225 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $3,516 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY & HEALING: $3,200 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY: $2,089 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetShepherds Gate: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL DBA VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $1,804 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $1,361 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $1,061 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSave the Whales: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS HEALTH GUILD: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN HEART KITCHEN OF LIVERMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY & HEALING ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANIMAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Gate ↗
  • Who funds TRI-VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL DBA VALLEY MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CENTER WALNUT CREEK ↗
  • Who funds Save the Whales ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oakland Athletics Community FundCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oakland Athletics Community Fund · Lowell Berry Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steve & Desiree Ralph Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steve & Desiree Ralph Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Steve & Desiree Ralph Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Steve & Desiree Ralph Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steve & Desiree Ralph Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph