· Private foundation
Aeg Community Foundation (Fka Staples Center Foundation)
AEG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IS ORGANIZED FOR THE PRIMARY EXEMPT PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING EDUCATIONAL AND RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND OTHER CHARITABLE ACTIVITIES IN THE UNITED STATES.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $17k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $520k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| City Year New York | $25,000 |
| Central American Resource Center - CARECEN | $25,000 |
| The Troy Andrews Foundation | $25,000 |
| Heart of Los Angeles | $25,000 |
| YMCA of Metropolitan Los Angeles | $25,000 |
| Alianza Coachella Valley | $25,000 |
| California Hospital Medical Center Foundation | $20,000 |
| INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST | $20,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Carson | $20,000 |
| INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST | $20,000 |
| INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST | $20,000 |
| INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST | $20,000 |
| All Peoples Community Center | $20,000 |
| INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST | $20,000 |
| Olive Crest | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $175k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC3× · 2020–2025 · $185k · revenue +30%
LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION2× · 2020–2023 · $125k · revenue +45%- APALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER3× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $125k
- GMGRAMMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2017 · $115k · revenue +17%
- PEPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZEDone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…
Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…
To prepare students for leadership in the arts and business; where creativity, academic knowledge and financial literacy are essential for success. we are providing an education that integrates the four lenses of learning: academics, arts,…
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
Tk-12 charter public school focused on educational equity and success for all students with a priority on tradionally underserved populations.
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
The al wooten jr. youth center is a neighborhood approach to the revitalization and empowerment of a community in crisis. we provide a safe and nurturing environment committed to good citizenship and academic excellence.
Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.
Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.
Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…
The organization is committed to "initiating and supporting signs of hope for the city of los angeles" by empowering people, achieving social justice and economic development and promoting the well being of communities as envisioned by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girls Incorporated of New York City and the most unlike its peers is Urban Txt Teens Exploring Technology. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GRAMMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS WRITE NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds THE ARTHUR PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BOSS Inc ↗
- Who funds Living Arts ↗
- Who funds READ 718 INC ↗
- Who funds Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California ↗
- Who funds Angelica Center for Arts and Music ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness ↗
- Who funds TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds HOLLENBECK POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds FILM2FUTURE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds CITY OF DREAMS ↗
- Who funds THE NUCI PHILLIPS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON RECORD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The California Endowment · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Play Equity Fund · Great Public Schools Now · United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aeg Community Foundation (Fka Staples Center Foundation) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.