Skip to content

· Public charity

St John's Community Health

To improve community health and reduce health disparities by delivering high quality, comprehensive services and impacting health and social policy.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.6MPhilanthropy$1.4MEducation$1.2MCrime & Legal$1.0MHuman Services$906kCommunity Improvement$824kHousing & Shelter$367kCivil Rights$114kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $6,326,251, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,289,775 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $963,524 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.0M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$178M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH JUSTICE ACTION FUND$6,000,000
COMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT$90,000
RAINBOW PRIDE YOUTH ALLIANCE$50,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$35,000
BLACK AIDS INSTITUTE$25,051
FOUNDATION FOR THE COMPTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$15,000
PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS$15,000
ALIANZA TRANSLATINX$10,000
ESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION$10,000
COMPTON RUN CLUB INC$10,000
PS TEST INC$10,000
BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE$10,000
LEADERSUP$10,000
CITY OF INDIO$6,200
FIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $912k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $43k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $39k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $36k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $34k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $33k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $24k → 14%SUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $6k → 14%UNIQUE WOMAN'S COALITION: $42k → 14%UNIQUE WOMAN'S COALITION: $32k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $92k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $82k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $76k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $76k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $76k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $69k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $38k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $15k → 14%EL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 20 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
18

Total granted

$12M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+42%

Still filing today

85%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $170k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • S
    SAJE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +44%
  • TA
    THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $548k · revenue +176%
  • PF
    Program for Torture Victims
    9× · 2017–2025 · $548k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARE CONSULTING GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $258k
  • JWCH INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +94%
  • EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
2
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
3
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
4
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
5
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
6
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
7
Family Health Care Centers of Greater Los Angeles

Family health care centers of greater los angeles aims to enchance the quality of life for men, women, and children in the greater los angeles through the provision of high quality, accessible and affordable health care services.

Health
8
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
9
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles

To provide convenient and affordable access to a comprehensive range of quality reproductive health care and sexual health information through patient services, education, and advocacy.

Health
10
Apla Health & Wellness

Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.

Health
11
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
The Center in Hollywood

The center provides a place of community to end isolation, build relationships, and introduce housing, health and wellness services to adult individuals experiencing homelessness in hollywood. it contracts with public and non-profit grant…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Valley Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pstest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
29/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEALTH JUSTICE ACTION FUND: $6,050,000 · OtherHEALTH JUSTICE ACTION FUNDCOMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,147,660 · OtherCOMPTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT+22 more: $1,109,291 · Other+22 moreSAJE: $1,194,905 · HealthSAJEChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $513,379 · HealthChildren's Hospital L…AFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE: $422,225 · HealthAFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS…TARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $189,947 · HealthTARZANA TREATMENT CEN…JWCH INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $100,000 · HealthSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 · Health+3 more: $56,033 · HealthCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,416,625 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA …+2 more: $45,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $548,060 · Crime & LegalHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $423,524 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $6,000 · Crime & LegalProgram for Torture Victims: $548,057 · Human ServicesSUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $215,200 · Human ServicesUnique Womans Coalition: $104,163 · Human ServicesEL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC: $100,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $352,168 · Housing & ShelterSOLIDARITY: $48,936 · EducationKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $20,000 · EducationFoundation for compton Community College District: $15,000 · EducationFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $6,000 · Education
Other$8,306,951Health$2,776,489Philanthropy$1,461,625Crime & Legal$977,584Human Services$973,420Housing & Shelter$352,168Education$89,936

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,416,625 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAJE: $1,194,905 over 7y, 11% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $548,060 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetProgram for Torture Victims: $548,057 over 9y, 5.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $513,379 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMIES UNIDOS INC: $423,524 over 7y, 7.8% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN AIDS POLICY AND TRAINING INSTITUTE: $422,225 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetESPERANZA COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION: $352,168 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSUNRISE COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER INC: $215,200 over 7y, 25% of budgetTARZANA TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $189,947 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $125,179 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnique Womans Coalition: $104,163 over 3y, 16% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEL PROYECTO DEL BARRIO INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CLINIC 'SERVING CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES': $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT HEALTH SERVICES SUPPORT FUND INC dba The LA Trust: $61,823 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCOMUNIDADES INDIGENAS EN LIDERAZGO CORP: $55,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetSOLIDARITY: $48,936 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTRANSGENDER HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER: $40,033 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OUTSIDE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY: $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEXPERTS UNITED FOR HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING SOLUTIONS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMPERIAL COURT OF LOS ANGELES HOLLYWOOD: $20,633 over 2y, 28% of budgetKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALIANZA TRANSLATINX: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetFoundation for compton Community College District: $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetNeighborhood Legal Services of Los Angeles County: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE LA-IAF: $10,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetPSTEST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASS LIBERATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA32.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · Community Partners · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The California Endowment · Durfee Foundation · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St John's Community Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St John's Community Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St John's Community Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph