Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Ssfcu Charitable Foundation Inc

The mission of ssfcu charitable foundation, inc.

$145k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.

Human Services$102kHealth$72kHousing & Shelter$54kReligion$20kEmployment$10kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$10kInternational$6k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $16,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $145,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $128,600 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$276k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP$10,000
RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO$6,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LEE AND BEULAH CHILDREN'S: $10k → 21%FRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT: $10k → 10%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC: $10k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S CENTER: $6k → 16%YCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER: $6k → 9%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS: $10k → 21%GREEN VALLEY FOUNDATION: $10k → 27%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $7k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$86k · 4 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
21

Total granted

$86k
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+42%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEmploymentCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $30k · revenue +72%
  • HV
    HOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2019–2022 · $24k · revenue +135%
  • RC
    Respite Care of San Antonio Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $12k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • MM
    MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +79%
  • EP
    El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -21%
  • LB
    LEE & BEULAH MOOR CHILDREN'S HOMEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +42%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
House of Hope

Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.

—
2
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
3
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
4
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
5
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
6
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
7
The Center for Women and Children in Crisis

Provide a caring, advocating, safe, and educationally based environment for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
8
Child Crisis Center of El Paso Inc

The mission of the Child Crisis Center is to protect children, newborn through fifteen years of age, from abuse/neglect by providing temporary short-term emergency shelter and family support services.

Human Services
9
Peace House Inc

Peace house is dedicated to ending interpersonal violence and abuse by empowering survivors to heal and thrive and providing support services, safe housing, and prevention education.

Human Services
10
La Casa Inc

Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.

—
11
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
12
Hope House of Sedona

Hope House of Sedona provides families experiencing homelessness access to safe haven, support, and tools for lasting stability.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Upward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr15%33%20–35yr10%33%35–55yr15%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr18%8%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr10%40%35–55yr15%19%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
2,081/14,056

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC — $23,286 · Human ServicesMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INCRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $12,100 · Human ServicesRespite Care of San Antonio IncLEE & BEULAH MOOR CHILDREN'S HOME — $10,000 · Human ServicesLEE & BEULAH MOOR CHILDREN'S HOMEOPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS — $10,000 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESSFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INCFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INCANGELS OF LOVE — $10,000 · Human ServicesANGELS OF LOVETHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $6,300 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTERYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $6,000 · Human ServicesYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTERCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $30,309 · HealthCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUN…El Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation — $10,000 · HealthEl Paso Childrens Hospit…People's Health Clicnic — $10,000 · HealthPeople's Health ClicnicUpward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanship — $5,500 · HealthUpward Transitions Thera…Children's Hospital Colorado — $5,500 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colo…FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $20,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST C…FAMILY ENDEAVORS INC — $10,000 · OtherFAMILY ENDEAVORS INCEL PASO VILLA MARIA INC — $10,000 · OtherEL PASO VILLA MARIA INCBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS…CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND — $6,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUNDBRIGHTON CENTER — $5,400 · OtherBRIGHTON CENTERHOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP — $23,670 · Housing & ShelterHOMELESS VETE…REBUILDING TOGETHER SAN ANTONIO INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterREBUILDING TO…Care and Share Inc — $10,000 · Food & NutritionENABLEUTAH INC — $10,000 · EmploymentTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Community Improvement
Human Services$97,686Health$61,309Other$61,400Housing & Shelter$33,670Food & Nutrition$10,000Employment$10,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $30,309 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOMELESS VETERANS FELLOWSHIP — $23,670 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMAGDALENA MINISTRIES INC — $23,286 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $12,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEl Paso Childrens Hospital Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEE & BEULAH MOOR CHILDREN'S HOME — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPPORTUNITY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPeople's Health Clicnic — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF SWITCHPOINT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ENDEAVORS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASO VILLA MARIA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetENABLEUTAH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYCC FAMILY CRISIS CENTER — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUpward Transitions Therapeutic Horsemanship — $5,500 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER — $5,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Faye L & William L Co…St Luke's Lutheran He…United Way of San Ant…San Antonio Area Foun…John R & Greli N Less…The Charity Ball Asso…The Texas Cavaliers C…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…John L Santikos Chari…Harvey E Najim Charit…Union Pacific Foundat…
Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · San Antonio Area Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Union Pacific Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ssfcu Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ssfcu Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ssfcu Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $153k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines