· Public charity
Special Kids Fund Inc
To raise funds for social service organizations, non-profit organizations, schools,and hospitals throughout the u.s.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 18 grants below total $265,163 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $923,223 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $658,060 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $134k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $70,355 |
| ASPCA | $24,821 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $23,960 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $18,613 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $18,358 |
| CAMP HASC | $18,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $15,153 |
| WORLD WILDLIFE FUND | $15,141 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA | $7,655 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $7,344 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA | $6,948 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $6,412 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $5,825 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $5,767 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $5,533 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $343k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $603k · revenue +40%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches8× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +46%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +33%
Funded once
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -40%- TFTECHNOLOGY FOR FAMILIES IN NEED INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $18k · revenue +548%
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angelesgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.
To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…
To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Sojourners Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MEDS & FOOD FOR KIDS ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER SANTA BARBARA ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds TECHNOLOGY FOR FAMILIES IN NEED INC ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds Bounty & Soul ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS ↗
- Who funds FOR HIS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The US Charitable Gift Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Special Kids Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Special Kids Fund Inc?
Find your warmest path to Special Kids Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.