· Private foundation
SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k7 grants · $18k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $773k
- $250k+3 grants · $4.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lakeview Christian Home of the Southwest Inc | $2,200,000 |
| Artesia Public Schools | $1,897,781 |
| Haven of Hope Inc | $259,434 |
| West Texas Counseling & Guidance Inc | $244,000 |
| Artesia Arts Council | $133,800 |
| National Dance Institute | $130,828 |
| Grammy's House | $128,000 |
| Little Castle Learning & Development Center | $84,328 |
| Carlsbad LifeHouse Inc | $52,000 |
| Witness Inc | $5,000 |
| City of Champions Inc | $3,500 |
| The Food Depot | $2,500 |
| Sexual Assault Services of NM | $2,500 |
| St Vincent de Paul | $1,500 |
| Assurance Home Inc | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $759k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHASSURANCE HOME INC6× · 2017–2022 · $433k · revenue +202%
- NDNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC5× · 2017–2022 · $394k · revenue +43%
- SASEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM6× · 2017–2022 · $310k · revenue +107%
Funded once
- LCLittle Castle Learning Dev Cntrone grant, 2020 · $77k
- AARCAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +43%
- LHLANDSUN HOMES INCone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue -82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
La Casa de Buena Salud, Inc. doing business as La Casa Family Health Center and doing business as La Casa Community Behavioral Health is an innovative, community-based financially resourceful, total health care organization committed to…
Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
To provide health care to the families of artesia and surrounding communities while continually improving quality of patient care and utilizing resources effectively and efficiently.
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…
United way of northern new mexico is a service organization that works with integrity and ethics to foster collaboration, ensure inclusivity, respect and generousity honoring family, tradition and culture.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Dance Institute Nm Inc and the most unlike its peers is Artesia Emergency Relief. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAKEVIEW CHRISTIAN HOME OF THE SOUTHWEST INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Artesia Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds Mwebaza Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ASSURANCE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
- Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CAMP MARY WHITE INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
- Who funds GRAMMY'S HOUSE ARTESIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds LITTLE CASTLE LEARNING & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHIJNAYA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REINS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds CARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ARCA ↗
- Who funds LANDSUN HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds ARTESIA EMERGENCY RELIEF ↗
- Who funds GREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WITNESS INC ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CITY OF CHAMPIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATE THE BEAT ↗
- Who funds PAWS & CLAWS HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds ERIE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S WORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Estelle H Yates Foundation · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · PY Foundation · Written in Red Inc · John a and Charlotte G Yates Legacy Foundation · Tlc Foundation From the Heart · United Way of Eddy County · Frank W Yates Jr Family Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.