· Private foundation
Tlc Foundation From the Heart
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $191k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $538k
- $250k+4 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UMC FOUNDATION UMC HEALTH SYSTEMS | $1,600,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER | $1,300,000 |
| BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $1,000,000 |
| ARTESIA RECREATION CENTER | $300,000 |
| ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL | $137,500 |
| SOUTHEAST NM VETERAN'S TRANSPORTATION NETWORK | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARLSBAD | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| FAITH BAPTIST CHURCH | $50,000 |
| ROSWELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT - GODDARD HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| HAVEN OF HOPE | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| CARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $427k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $456k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBaylor College of Medicine5× · 2020–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +47%
- GLGOD'S LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +963%
- SCSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC4× · 2020–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +14%
Funded once
- LNLANDSUN NURSING HOMEone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- UFUMC FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +30%
- MAMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $69k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide drug and alcohol rehabilitation for men and women to break the addiction
Christain Home
The organization serves its membership through advocacy, networking, education, and communication by promoting success and best practices for home care, hospice, and related home health support services.
The purpose of argos, a shelter dog rescue is: to rescue animals from situations that are abusive, endangering, or neglectful. to rescue animals in danger of being euthanized in new mexico shelters/pounds. to provide necessary veterinary…
The organization works to Minister to inmates and others in need through the sharing of God's word and inpsirational gospel music.
To deliver the highest quality care to sustain the health and well-being of every patient through the variety of healthcare services we provide.
The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.
Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.
Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care
Desert views mission is to support an individuals healing practice of christian science by providing christian science nursing whenever there is a need.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Artesia General Hospital and the most unlike its peers is God's Light in the Darkness Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LIGHT IN THE DARKNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CARLSBADINC ↗
- Who funds ASSURANCE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds CARC INC ↗
- Who funds SENM VETERANS TRANSPORTATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds EDDY COUNTY CASA AUXILIARY ↗
- Who funds CARLSBAD LIFEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BRITTANY'S HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Written in Red Inc · PY Foundation · The Estelle H Yates Foundation · John a and Charlotte G Yates Legacy Foundation · United Way of Eddy County · SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation · Frank W Yates Jr Family Foundation · God's Light in the Darkness Foundation · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tlc Foundation From the Heart funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.