· Private foundation
Frank W Yates Jr Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k54 grants · $170k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $120k
Anchored by a single position — about 98% of reported assets are held in Of Eog Resources Stock.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARTESIA RECREATION CENTER FOUNDATIO | $25,000 |
| CLIMATE INTEL | $15,000 |
| SANTA FE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| LIFE HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| COALITION FOR OSTEOPOROSIS | $10,000 |
| RECOVERY AVENUE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| LAS CAMPANAS COUMMUNITY FUND | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN NM | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $6,000 |
| SHE JUMPS | $6,000 |
| GREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW7× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +90%
- ARArtesia Recreation Center Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +607%
- CLCHANGING LIVES COALITION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $42k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- PBPERMIAN BASIN COUNSELING & GUIDANCEone grant, 2022 · $75k
- AAARTESIA AQUATIC CENTERone grant, 2019 · $50k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.
The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…
Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…
To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…
The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…
New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
The mission of growing up new mexico is to engage the whole community, bringing together people and resources to create increased opportunities for young children and the adults in their lives to achieve their dreams and aspirations.
We empower and support our community by providing trauma-informed comprehensive care across the lifespan.
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of New Mexico and the most unlike its peers is Recovery Avenue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds Artesia Recreation Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds Artesia Arts Council Inc ↗
- Who funds CHANGING LIVES COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SheJumps ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds WORLD'S OKAYEST MOM INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds HELP IN HEALING HOME FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds LIFE WATERS ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HORSES FOR HEROES - NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds SAFER NEW MEXICO NOW INC ↗
- Who funds Roswell Symphony Orchestra Inc ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING LIFE YOUTH RANCH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RECOVERY AVENUE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · PY Foundation · Written in Red Inc · The Estelle H Yates Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Tlc Foundation From the Heart · Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee · Brindle Foundation · John a and Charlotte G Yates Legacy Foundation · SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation · Illinois No 3 Foundation · Rotary Club of Santa Fe Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Frank W Yates Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safe Kids Worldwide — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.