Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
75
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$206k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of CHASE FOUNDATION MACK C CHASE TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k49 grants · $225k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $307k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $776k
$6,250
Median grant
17
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY$206,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY$170,750
ARTESIA CLASSICAL ACADEMY$100,000
WRITTEN IN RED FOUNDATION$91,300
ARTESIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$82,667
EASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY$65,250
SHERIDAN ROTARY CLUB$60,000
WEST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$32,250
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$28,750
Individual grant recipient$25,000
TEXAS TECH HEALTH SCIENCES$24,750
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$17,500
ARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$16,500
NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING &$15,250
ARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THINK NEW MEXICO: $1k → 12%D1 NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%D1 NEW MEXICO: $4k → 14%CARC INC: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MN
IL
MI
NV
WY
IA
IN
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
TN
SC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 125 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

125 repeat relationships — 61 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

125
69

Total granted

$12M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+15%

Still filing today

25%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $224k · revenue +25%
  • AC
    ARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +48%
  • HU
    HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $51k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • AH
    ARTESIA HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $358k
  • AR
    ARTESIA RECREATIONAL CENTER FOUNDAT
    one grant, 2023 · $333k
  • CR
    CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +92%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
2
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
3
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
4
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
7
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
8
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
9
Arcadia University

Arcadia university's pioneering, global, integrated, liberal arts, and professional learning experience cultivates leaders who are intellectually fearless and uniquely prepared for life and work. our highly regarded, values-based learning…

Education
10
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hardin-Simmons University and the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%7%<5yr12%12%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr17%12%20–35yr16%14%35–55yr18%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr12%7%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr16%12%35–55yr18%47%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/84
the rest of the field
12%
1,110/9,556

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/56
Grantees still filing
40/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,974,350 · OtherNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY — $1,661,123 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO — $1,314,750 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICOEASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITY — $837,500 · OtherEASTERN NEW MEXICO UNIVERSITYARTESIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $543,566 · OtherARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Other+156 more — $4,626,612 · Other+156 moreArtesia Classical Academy Inc — $300,000 · EducationArtesia C…LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $224,000 · EducationLUBBOCK C…WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $143,750 · EducationWAYLAND B…CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · EducationCAL RIPKE…HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $51,250 · Education+27 more — $399,654 · Education+27 moreCITY OF CHAMPIONS INC — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsSHERIDAN ROTARY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHAVEN OF HOPE INC — $18,500 · Housing & ShelterARTESIA CLEAN & BEAUTIFUL — $11,500 · EnvironmentD1 NEW MEXICO — $8,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Philanthropy
Other$12,457,901Education$1,218,654Recreation & Sports$120,000Housing & Shelter$18,500Environment$11,500Human Services$8,500Philanthropy$7,500

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetArtesia Classical Academy Inc — $300,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetLUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $224,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $143,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCITY OF CHAMPIONS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $69,464 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION — $61,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetHARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $51,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetArtesia Arts Council Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $36,363 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ARTESIA FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST — $31,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCreighton University — $28,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $28,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $28,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $27,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $26,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Christian University — $23,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING LIVES COALITION INC — $21,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetSHERIDAN ROTARY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $19,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE INC — $18,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetEvangel University — $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOTTAWA UNIVERSITY — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $16,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Dallas — $16,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Christian University — $15,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $15,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTESIA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSt Mary's University — $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $11,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetARTESIA CLEAN & BEAUTIFUL — $11,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $9,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY — $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $8,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREINS FOR LIFE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBright Future Inc — $4,541 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTabor College — $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY — $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University — $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCMURRY UNIVERSITY — $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTESSORI ADVANCEMENT ORGANIZATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARTESIA AQUATIC CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Artesia Classical Academy Inc
  • Who funds LUBBOCK CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WAYLAND BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CITY OF CHAMPIONS INC
  • Who funds ARTESIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HARDIN-SIMMONS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Artesia Arts Council Inc
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Written in Red IncNM32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 3 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Written in Red Inc · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · PY Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · San Antonio Livestock Exposition Educational Fund Inc · SP & Estelle Yates Family Foundation · Texas Higher Education Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Estelle H Yates Foundation · Richard Wallrath Educational Foundation · The Maxine Durrett Earl Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc12% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Christian University0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee?

Find your warmest path to Chase Foundation Mack C Chase Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 209 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph