Skip to content
Solidaire Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Solidaire Network Inc

Solidaire Network nurtures relationships within social movements to create regenerative systems rooted in love and justice.

$9.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
135
Grants FY2025still arriving
29
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Civil Rights$23MArts & Culture$4.0MHuman Services$3.8MEnvironment$3.8MCommunity Improvement$3.6MPhilanthropy$2.7MCrime & Legal$2.7MPublic Benefit$2.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 135 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 135 grants below total $7,912,942, the rows itemized in this filing. The $9,326,217 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,413,275 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k86 grants · $6.8M
$50,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Highlander Research & Education Center$200,000
Taproot Earth$200,000
Tides Center$200,000
Chico Feminist Women's Health Centers$150,000
National Black Food and Justice Alliance$150,000
Tewa Women United$150,000
Native American Community Board$150,000
Indigenous Women Rising$150,000
Indigenous Environmental Network$150,000
Black Farmer Fund Inc$150,000
NDN Collective$138,080
NEO Philanthropy Inc$120,000
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation$100,000
Center for Empowered Politics Education Fund$100,000
Fractured Atlas$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Northeast Native Network of Kinship and Healing Inc: $125k → 8%Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $200k → 10%Tides Center: $75k → 10%Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples: $100k → 18%Jakara Movement: $65k → 19%African Communities Together: $80k → 28%Chainbreaker Collective: $65k → 12%La Plazita Institute: $250k → 14%Tewa Women United: $100k → 18%Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in Solidarity: $100k → 10%One Love Global: $70k → 9%The Knights and Orchids Society: $100k → 33%Freedom Inc: $100k → 10%Hmong American Women's Association: $80k → 17%Barred Business Foundation: $85k → 14%United for a New Economy for Colorado Homes for All: $100k → 10%Ramapough Culture and Land Foundation: $80k → 6%Native American Community Board: $150k → 22%Native Women's Society of the Great Plains: $80k → 25%Community Ready Corps Inc: $100k → 24%Tides Center: $75k → 10%TODEC Legal Center: $50k → 11%Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples: $100k → 18%Chainbreaker Collective: $50k → 12%Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in Solidarity: $65k → 10%Freedom Inc: $50k → 10%Hmong American Women's Association: $55k → 17%Barred Business Foundation CO: $60k → 14%United for a New Economy for Colorado Homes for All: $50k → 10%Ramapough Culture and Land Foundation: $55k → 6%Tides Center: $75k → 10%PANASD: $75k → 11%Tewa Women United: $150k → 12%Barred Business Foundation: $60k → 14%Tides Center: $60k → 10%Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering (TAKE Resource Center): $115k → 16%Tides Center: $55k → 10%SisterSong Inc: $100k → 13%Cooperation Jackson: $100k → 23%Equity and Transformation: $65k → 14%Equity and Transformation: $100k → 14%We the People of Detroit: $100k → 21%Southeast Immigrant Rights Network: $55k → 13%Transgender Gender Variant Intersex Justice Project: $100k → 10%Tides Center: $300k → 10%Tides Center for Palestine Legal: $80k → 10%SPM Disability Justice Fund: $60k → 10%Black Organizing Project: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Solidaire Network Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Solidaire Network Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 137 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

137 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
128

Total granted

$41M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

90%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +17%
  • NM
    NATIVE MOVEMENT
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +80%
  • Center for Third World Organizing
    5× · 2021–2025 · $800k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • GF
    Groundswell Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -55%
  • PI
    Polaris Institute USA
    one grant, 2021 · $385k · revenue -81%
  • TJ
    TRANS JUSTICE FUNDING PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $313k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
5
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
6
Black in Action Collective

Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities

Civil Rights
7
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
8
Communities Rise

Communities Rise fosters movements to build power in communities impacted by systemic oppression. To create an equitable system, we pursue cross-sector collaboration, and provide capacity building and legal services for community…

Crime & Legal
9
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
10
Wepower

We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.

Community Improvement
11
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
12
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Middle East Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
68
Early backer (in before they grew)
288/298
Grantees still filing
141/298
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT SOUTH INC: $1,015,000 · OtherCenter for Third World Organizing: $800,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc: $1,334,880 · OtherNEO Philanthropy IncTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $1,065,000 · Other+88 more: $17,354,186 · Other+88 moreTIDES CENTER: $1,283,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $1,005,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATIO…Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $400,000 · Human ServicesCOOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI: $315,000 · Human Services+30 more: $4,892,500 · Human Services+30 moreRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $1,715,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CIT…BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $525,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUI…DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $515,000 · Civil RightsDEFENDING RIGHTS…THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $491,500 · Civil RightsTHE RECONCILIATI…MISSISSIPPI VOTES: $375,000 · Civil RightsBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $335,000 · Civil RightsTHE SIKH COALITION: $325,000 · Civil RightsONE FAIR WAGE INC: $307,000 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center: $300,000 · Civil RightsAnti Police-Terror Project Inc: $266,000 · Civil Rights+18 more: $2,264,654 · Civil Rights+18 moreALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $715,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ME…Alternate RootsInc: $425,000 · Arts & CultureAlternate…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $415,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED…DANCERS GROUP: $360,000 · Arts & CultureDANCERS G…FREE PRESS: $276,000 · Arts & CultureFREE PRES…The Bottom: $230,000 · Arts & CultureThe Botto…U B W INC A/K/A URBAN BUSH WOMEN INC: $209,000 · Arts & CultureKOIHONUA: $200,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $200,000 · Arts & CultureACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom: $185,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK IN APPALACHIA: $180,000 · Arts & CultureMemphis Artists for Change: $175,000 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR CULTURAL PRODUCTION: $155,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $485,000 · Arts & Culture+4 morePROTEUS FUND INC: $765,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $630,000 · EducationSISTERREACH: $510,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $442,500 · EducationALABAMA JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $325,000 · EducationVILLAGE MICRO FUND: $280,000 · EducationGrassroots Power Project: $200,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA: $200,000 · Education+3 more: $245,000 · EducationHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,538,000 · EnvironmentTaproot Earth: $400,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH: $345,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND: $300,000 · EnvironmentUrban Tilth: $280,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $230,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN CONSERVATION PARTNERS INC: $212,000 · Environment+3 more: $290,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE MOVEMENT: $1,100,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $600,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $600,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $388,080 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $355,000 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC: $150,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $145,000 · Community Improvement
Other$21,569,066Human Services$7,895,500Civil Rights$7,419,154Arts & Culture$4,210,000Education$3,597,500Environment$3,595,000Community Improvement$3,338,080

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE: $1,715,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,538,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc: $1,334,880 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $1,283,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT: $1,100,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC: $1,065,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC: $1,015,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC: $1,005,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $800,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $765,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $715,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK: $630,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION: $600,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC: $600,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $600,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS: $590,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC: $525,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC: $515,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetSISTERREACH: $510,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetGroundswell Fund: $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $491,500 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $450,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $442,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAlternate RootsInc: $425,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetARCHCITY DEFENDERS: $415,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $415,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPARCELERAS AFROCARIBENAS POR LA TRANSFORM BARRIAL: $400,000 over 3y, 65% of budgetAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $400,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec: $400,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetTaproot Earth: $400,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC: $388,080 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPolaris Institute USA: $385,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY: $382,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VOTES: $375,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetDANCERS GROUP: $360,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC: $355,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetFeminist Womens Health Center Inc: $355,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH: $345,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC: $335,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetALABAMA JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $325,000 over 5y, 63% of budgetTHE SIKH COALITION: $325,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetBLACK BELT JUSTICE CENTER: $315,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetWESPAC FOUNDATION INC: $315,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCOOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI: $315,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC: $307,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Borealis PhilanthropyCommon Counsel Founda…Proteus Fund IncNEO Philanthropy IncGroundswell FundTides FoundationMs Foundation for Wom…Wellspring Philanthro…Windward FundTides CenterRsf Social Finance Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC137.4× affinity167 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Groundswell Fund · Tides Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Tides Center · Rsf Social Finance Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solidaire Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solidaire Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation: 100% of income from government
  • Northeast Native Network of Kinship and: 44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Solidaire Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home