Skip to content
Siouxland Human Investment Partnership at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Siouxland Human Investment Partnership

SIOUXLAND HUMAN INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP provides leadership, identifying and responding to community needs by advocating for and collaboratively supporting the delivery of health, human services, education, and public safety with positive community impact.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$415k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.8MEducation$3.4MHuman Services$3.0MCommunity Improvement$753kCrime & Legal$466kReligion$362kPublic Benefit$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $1,048,941, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,196,754 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $147,813 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $261k
  • $250k+2 grants · $712k
$29,439
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRITTENTON CENTER$414,772
SIOUXLAND DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT$297,646
COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND$90,870
MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE$62,555
LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA$56,201
MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC$51,085
NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC$29,439
MARY ELIZABETH DAYCARE$10,740
LITTLE DUCKLINGS DAYCARE$8,510
BUILDING BLOCKS PRESCHOOL CHILDCARE$8,190
CRIMINAL & JUVENILE JUSTICE PLANNING$6,795
CUBBY CARE CAMPUS$6,290
ST PAUL LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL$5,848
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $56k → 10%CRITTENTON CENTER: $526k → 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $52k → 10%CRITTENTON CENTER: $504k → 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $51k → 10%CRITTENTON CENTER: $456k → 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $38k → 10%CRITTENTON CENTER: $427k → 13%CRITTENTON CENTER: $421k → 13%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY: $76k → 7%CRITTENTON CENTER: $415k → 13%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $62k → 7%CRITTENTON CENTER: $369k → 13%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $53k → 7%CRITTENTON CENTER: $365k → 13%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $51k → 7%CRITTENTON CENTER: $343k → 13%MID SIOUX OPPORTUMITY INC: $50k → 7%MID SIOUX OPPORTUMITY INC: $47k → 7%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $45k → 7%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY: $13k → 7%MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY: $10k → 7%LUTHERN SERVICES IN IOWA: $128k → 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $120k → 13%LUTHERN SERVICES IN IOWA: $115k → 13%MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $84k → 13%MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $63k → 13%MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $31k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $30k → 13%LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA: $79k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $28k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER: $45k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $27k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER: $42k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COM HOUSE: $24k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $41k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COM HOUSE: $23k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $38k → 13%MARY ELIZABETH PRESCHOOL: $17k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $29k → 13%MARY TREGLIA COM HOUSE: $14k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER: $25k → 13%MARY ELIZABETHER DAY NURSERY ASSOCIATION: $11k → 13%NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER: $15k → 13%MARY ELIZABETH DAYCARE: $11k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 23 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +55% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
3

Total granted

$12M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+55%

Still filing today

52%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CRITTENTON CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +212%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +20%
  • MO
    MID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $408k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PAUL LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $9k
  • WI
    WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +55%
  • BD
    BAMBINO'S DAYCARE
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa Chapter of Children's Advocacy Centers

To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.

Crime & Legal
2
Iowa Aces 360

To improve the health and well-being of all by empowering communities, organizations, and people to take informed actions to prevent and mitigate the lifelong effects of childhood adversity.

Health
3
South Central Iowa Community Action Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…

Community Improvement
4
Mid-Iowa Community Action Inc

Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.

Community Improvement
5
Iowa Center for Children's Justice

ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.

Civil Rights
6
Iowa Association of Community Action Directors

To assist in the provision of a better life for iowa's low-income residents, through assistance to the community action organization located within the state.

—
7
Wayland Area Childcare Organization Organization

Wayland area child care organization's mission is to provide child care services to the citizens of wayland, iowa and surrounding communities.

Human Services
8
Community Action of Eastern Iowa

Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.

Community Improvement
9
Good Shepherd Corporation Iowa City Iowa

Good shepherd corporation provides high quality early childhood education for children 6 weeeks to 9 years of age

—
10
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
11
Montessori School of Iowa City Inc

To provide authentic montessori education that serves the child's intrinsic motivation to learn and is inclusive, sustainable and holistic.

—
12
Northeast Iowa Community Action Corp

Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Sioux Opportunity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bb's Preschool and Childcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIOUXLAND DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT: $3,645,119 · OtherSIOUXLAND DISTRICT HEALTH DEPTCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND: $1,470,615 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLANDSAFEPLACE: $263,817 · Other+15 more: $520,269 · Other+15 moreTHE CRITTENTON CENTER: $3,826,561 · Human ServicesTHE CRITTENTON CENTERLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $637,835 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INCMID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $407,531 · Human ServicesMID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INCMARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $322,751 · Human ServicesMARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSENATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $234,813 · Human Services+1 more: $39,014 · Human ServicesIowa Legal Aid: $175,811 · Crime & LegalJACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $172,878 · HealthIOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN: $60,000 · EducationBB'S PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE: $53,180 · Education
Other$5,899,820Human Services$5,468,505Crime & Legal$175,811Health$172,878Education$113,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CRITTENTON CENTER: $3,826,561 over 9y, 17% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND: $1,470,615 over 9y, 2.7% of budgetLUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC: $637,835 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC: $407,531 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetMARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $322,751 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetSAFEPLACE: $263,817 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $234,813 over 7y, 20% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $175,811 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetJACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC: $172,878 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBB'S PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE: $53,180 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetMARY ELIZABETH DAY CARE CENTER: $39,014 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,075 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CRITTENTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds IOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds BB'S PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE ↗
  • Who funds MARY ELIZABETH DAY CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri River Histor…United Way of Siouxla…Siouxland Community F…Food Bank of Siouxlan…Community Fdn of Grea…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Missouri River Historical Development IncIA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri River Historical Development Inc · United Way of Siouxland Inc · Siouxland Community Foundation · Food Bank of Siouxland Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Siouxland Human Investment Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siouxland Human Investment Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Siouxland Human Investment Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home