· Public charity
Siouxland Human Investment Partnership
SIOUXLAND HUMAN INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP provides leadership, identifying and responding to community needs by advocating for and collaboratively supporting the delivery of health, human services, education, and public safety with positive community impact.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $1,048,941 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,196,754 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $147,813 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $261k
- $250k+2 grants · $712k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRITTENTON CENTER | $414,772 |
| SIOUXLAND DISTRICT HEALTH DEPARTMENT | $297,646 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND | $90,870 |
| MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE | $62,555 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA | $56,201 |
| MID SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC | $51,085 |
| NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC | $29,439 |
| MARY ELIZABETH DAYCARE | $10,740 |
| LITTLE DUCKLINGS DAYCARE | $8,510 |
| BUILDING BLOCKS PRESCHOOL CHILDCARE | $8,190 |
| CRIMINAL & JUVENILE JUSTICE PLANNING | $6,795 |
| CUBBY CARE CAMPUS | $6,290 |
| ST PAUL LUTHERAN PRESCHOOL | $5,848 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CRITTENTON CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +212%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +20%
- MOMID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $408k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- SPST PAUL LUTHERAN PRESCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $9k
- WIWESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +55%
- BDBAMBINO'S DAYCAREone grant, 2024 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the development, growth and utilization of childrens advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to better serve Iowas abused and neglected children and their families.
To improve the health and well-being of all by empowering communities, organizations, and people to take informed actions to prevent and mitigate the lifelong effects of childhood adversity.
To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…
Mica helps families experencing poverty meet their needs, build on their strengths, and achieve their goals.
ICCJ assists children in custody disputes through child focused education and legal services. ICCJ provides education and legal services on a reduced fee or at no charge based on the ability to pay.
To assist in the provision of a better life for iowa's low-income residents, through assistance to the community action organization located within the state.
Wayland area child care organization's mission is to provide child care services to the citizens of wayland, iowa and surrounding communities.
Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.
Good shepherd corporation provides high quality early childhood education for children 6 weeeks to 9 years of age
Child day care center
To provide authentic montessori education that serves the child's intrinsic motivation to learn and is inclusive, sustainable and holistic.
Through dynamic partnerships, quality family services, advocacy and education, neicac advances community development and improves social and economic conditions for individuals and families with limited resources.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Sioux Opportunity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bb's Preschool and Childcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CRITTENTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SERVICES IN IOWA INC ↗
- Who funds MID-SIOUX OPPORTUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds MARY J TREGLIA COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds JACKSON RECOVERY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BB'S PRESCHOOL AND CHILDCARE ↗
- Who funds MARY ELIZABETH DAY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds WESTERN IOWA TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Missouri River Historical Development Inc · United Way of Siouxland Inc · Siouxland Community Foundation · Food Bank of Siouxland Inc · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Siouxland Human Investment Partnership funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.