· Private foundation
Singer Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $641k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH COLORADO | $1,001,000 |
| TEMPLE EMANUEL | $500,000 |
| FEEDING COLORADOFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $275,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE | $200,000 |
| DENVER HEALTH FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO | $125,000 |
| JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMITTEE | $100,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MTNS | $75,000 |
| DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN PBS | $50,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| DENVER DUMB FRIENDS' LEAGUE | $50,000 |
| DENVER ART MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| FRIENDS OF FACES | $50,000 |
| STAENBERG-LOUP JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 49 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +92%
- PBPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC7× · 2018–2024 · $685k · revenue +60%
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $550k · revenue +108%
Funded once
- DDBIPone grant, 2023 · $50k
- CSColorado Succeedsone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -32%
- UOUJA-FEDERAL OF NEW YORKone grant, 2018 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Community organization dedicated to advancing a deep understanding of global affairs and cultures.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Denver Dumb Friends League and the most unlike its peers is Oklahoma Israel Exchange Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DENVER PUBLIC LIBRARY FRIENDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds WORLDREADERORG ↗
- Who funds 826 National Inc ↗
- Who funds MOISHE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds TOURETTE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds WONDERBOUND ↗
- Who funds ONETABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED RETIREMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER FREE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE EXCHANGE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds METRO CARING ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · JEWISHColorado · Melvin & Elaine Wolf Foundation · The Chotin Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Morse Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Singer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.