Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford Corp

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$254kHealth$87kEducation$12kHuman Services$4kCommunity Improvement$3kAnimals$3kCrime & Legal$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$35,000
MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION$12,500
CARRYWELL$3,500
CHRYSALIS HOUSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
OAK CITY CHURCH$1,000
ENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CARRYWELL: $4k → 16%OAK CITY CHURCH: $15k → 19%GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK: $1k → 8%RIVERDELL SHOOL: $5k → 7%SHAKER VILLAGE: $3k → 13%LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%JH RANCH: $1k → 16%OAK CITY CHURCH: $5k → 19%GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK: $1k → 8%RIVERDELL SHOOL: $5k → 7%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 15%JH RANCH: $1k → 16%OAK CITY CHURCH: $5k → 19%RIVERDELL SHOOL: $2k → 7%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%JH RANCH: $500 → 16%OAK CITY CHURCH: $1k → 19%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%OAK CITY CHURCH: $5k → 16%OAK CITY CHURCH: $1k → 19%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 15%OAK CITY CHURCH: $1k → 19%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 15%SHAKER VILLAGE: $1k → 13%LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 → 15%CHRYSALIS HOUSE: $1k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $38k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $14k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35k → 15%ASSURANCE CARE CENTER: $1k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $35k → 15%ASSURANCE CARE CENTER: $1k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 15%ASSURANCE CARE CENTER: $1k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 15%TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $13k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $13k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $12k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 13 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$369k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+74%

Still filing today

46%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $77k · revenue +59%
  • CH
    CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +65%
  • TL
    THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • SH
    STRATFORD HALLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +74%
  • LI
    LEXARTS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Civiclex Incorporated

Civiclex strengthens civic health in lexington, kentucky, by helping our community understand and get involved in local issues, connect with their neighbors and make decisions in a better way.

Arts & Culture
2
Commerce Lexington Inc

To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.

—
3
Commerce Lexington Foundation Inc

The mission of the commerce lexington foundation is to be a catalyst for positive impact on talent, quality of life and economic well-being for the citizens of the greater lexington region, by enabling commerce lexington to expand its…

Community Improvement
4
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
5
Claiborne Medical Center

Claiborne Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Lexington Public Library

Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…

Education
7
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
8
Ellis Hospital Foundation Inc the Foundation for Ellis Medicine

The foundation for ellis medicine ensures quality healthcare in our community by raising, investing and distributing funds that support the lifesaving work performed at ellis medicine. through the charitable gifts of individuals,…

Health
9
Lexington Clinic Foundation for Medical Education and Research Inc
Education
10
Lexington Public Library Foundation

The lexington public library foundation envisions a thriving public library enriched by philanthropy and advocacy.

Education
11
Montgomery Cancer Wellness Foundation

To provide supportive services, educational services, and assistance to cancer patients throughout central alabama, including those patients who lack the resources

Health
12
The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research (Us) Ltd

Partner with scientists to accelerate research that will transform the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer through ground breaking science carried out by individual investigators, multidisciplinary teams, and early stage…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lexington Cancer Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Envision Opelika Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $217,615 · OtherTATES CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $76,565 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INCOAK CITY CHURCH INC: $33,000 · OtherOAK CITY CHURCH INC+5 more: $18,000 · OtherRIVENDELL SCHOOL: $12,000 · EducationGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,000 · EducationCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $4,000 · HealthCARRYWELL: $3,500 · HealthTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $500 · PhilanthropyENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Community ImprovementSTRATFORD HALL: $1,000 · Arts & CultureLEXARTS INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$345,180Education$14,000Health$7,500Philanthropy$3,500Community Improvement$3,000Arts & Culture$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $76,565 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetRIVENDELL SCHOOL: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHRYSALIS HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRATFORD HALL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEXARTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVENDELL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CHRYSALIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARRYWELL ↗
  • Who funds THE LEXINGTON CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION OPELIKA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds STRATFORD HALL ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EAST ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LEXARTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford Corp funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford Corp. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford Corp?

    Find your warmest path to Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford Corp through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Shetome Corp Fka Katherine S & Farra Alford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph