· Private foundation
Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of ROSENSTEIN FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k36 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY | $40,000 |
| THE LEXINGTON SCHOOL | $12,550 |
| TEMPLE ADATH ISRAEL | $12,162 |
| UK SCHOOL OF MUSIC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,000 |
| UK SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK | $5,000 |
| LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY | $5,000 |
| ASPEN INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BLUEGRASS | $4,000 |
| GOD'S PANTRY | $3,500 |
| BLUEGRASS CARE NAVIGATORS (HOSPICE OF THE BLUEGRASS) | $3,000 |
| KENTUCKY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL PHILANTHROPY | $2,500 |
| BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,700 |
| TRANSYVANIA UNIVERSITY | $1,500 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
62 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLEXINGTON SCHOOL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +34%
- FAFAYETTE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $45k · revenue +54%
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +159%
Funded once
- UIUK INTEGRATIVE HEALTH SERVICESone grant, 2023 · $6k
- JAJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASSgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +197%
- LOLEXINGTON OPERA SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To provide care to our community and to serve as a major teaching hospital for education and training in medicine, dentistry, nursing, and allied health professions.
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
To provide a superior liberal education, to prepare future members of learned professions, to advance the frontiers of knowledge, and to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health
Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Aspen Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Old Friends Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LEXINGTON SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FAYETTE ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HENRY CLAY CENTER FOR STATESMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds THE HONORABLE TINA BROZMAN FDTN INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Bluegrass Inc ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
- Who funds SURGERY ON SUNDAY INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds LEXARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Christian Word Ministries Inc · The Mt Brilliant Family Foundation (Formerly Hgg Family Foundation) · Hilary Boone Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · William T Young Foundation Inc · Ee Murry Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Isaac Van Meter IV Fam Fund Inc Agy · Alex G Campbell Jr Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.