Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc

Our mission is to rescue food and redistribute it to all those experiencing food insecurity.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Food & Nutrition$347kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $23,931 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $20,414,561 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,390,630 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$3,181
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRI HEALTH MCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL$7,471
SALVATION ARMY MIDDLETOWN$7,086
NEW PATH INC$3,181
BUTLER COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES$2,111
VILLAGE FOOD PANTRY INC$2,069
HOUSE OF DELIVERANCE$2,013
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION: $100 → 14%FAMILY SERVICE OF MIDDLETOWN: $100 → 12%NEW PATH INC: $3k → 10%NEW PATH INC: $100 → 10%NEW PATH INC: $100 → 10%FAIRFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 12%LITTLE MIAMI FOOD SERVICE INC: $100 → 6%FAIRFIELD FOOD PANTRY: $100 → 12%LITTLE MIAMI FOOD SERVICE INC: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$318k · 31 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
30

Total granted

$318k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+7%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KL
    KINGS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +44%
  • BC
    BETHANY CENTER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +72%
  • TN
    THE NEW PATH INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • LC
    LINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue -26%
  • WC
    WEST CHESTER CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k
  • EM
    EDGEWOOD MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION BA
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
2
The Food Pantry Network of Licking County

Distribution of food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
3
Alliance Community Pantry Inc

The mission of the food pantry is to eliminate food insecurity in the alliance ohio area for residents who qualify under the guidelines of the ohio job and family services.

Human Services
4
Hilliard Food Pantry Plus

Hilliard Food Pantry Plus mission is to improve the well-being of our community by providing food and support

5
Faith Food Pantry

The mission of the food pantry is to help any resident who needs food assistance and to do so without judgement.faith does not discriminate by age, color, religious belief or gender.faith was founded on june 21, 1983 and was located in the…

Food & Nutrition
6
Caring and Sharing Food Pantry Inc

Caring & sharing food pantry is dedicated to fighting food insecurity in paulding county and work to ensure that every family paulding county, ohio has access to the food they need, regardless of their circumstances.

Food & Nutrition
7
Neighborhood Services Inc

Neighborhood services, inc. food pantry responds to the ill effects of poverty in central ohio by providing food and material assistance to persons in need. nsi strives to improve the quality of life in our community by compassionately and…

Food & Nutrition
8
Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc

Our mission is to rescue food and redistribute it to all those experiencing food insecurity.

9
Fulton County Food Basket Inc

To provide high quality nutritious fod to thosew in need with a program that will not foster dependency

10
Louisville Community Food Pantry Inc

The Louisville Community Food Pantry, Inc. is a non-profit organization providing supplemental groceries to families and individuals in Jefferson County who are in need. We provide food in a way that supports and sustains the dignity of…

Food & Nutrition
11
The Pantry of Oxford & Lafayette Co

Distribute food to needy families and individuals in the oxford-lafayette community

Human Services
12
Freestore Foodbank Inc

Improve lives by eliminating hunger in partnership with our community.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Open Door Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Found By Faith Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyButler County Health & Huma…Animal Rescue and Shelter S…Elementary School PTOsCommunity Recreation CentersAffordable Housing ProvidersCollegiate Greek Life Organ…Orphan Support and Family S…Christian Faith-Based Minis…Labor Union OrganizationsRegional Community Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr12%8%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr12%19%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr26%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr12%10%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr12%39%20–35yr11%12%35–55yr26%38%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
4/92
the rest of the field
10%
392/3,923

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW LIFE VINEYARD CHURCH — $72,432 · OtherNEW LIFE VINEYARD CHURCHNEW LIFE BAPTIST MISSION — $60,470 · OtherNEW LIFE BAPTIST MISSIONFAITH COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $50,200 · OtherFAITH COMMUNITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCHBUTLER COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES — $43,492 · OtherBUTLER COUNTY EDUCATIONAL SERVICESMT ZION TEMPLE APOSTOLIC CHURCH — $17,331 · OtherMT ZION TEMPLE APOSTOLIC CHURCHLINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,537 · Other+39 more — $53,209 · Other+39 moreFIRST PLACE FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,200 · Food & NutritionBETHANY CENTER — $5,200 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $1,092 · Food & NutritionFAIRFIELD FOOD PANTRY — $7,813 · Human ServicesTHE NEW PATH INC — $3,381 · Human Services+3 more — $400 · Human ServicesMCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED — $7,471 · HealthHEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC — $2,793 · HealthCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS — $900 · Health+2 more — $200 · HealthMARSHALL HIGH SCHOOL — $100 · EducationFOUND BY FAITH INC — $100 · ReligionSELF SUSTAINING ENTERPRISES INC — $100 · International
Other$307,671Food & Nutrition$26,492Human Services$11,594Health$11,364Education$100Religion$100International$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIRST PLACE FOOD PANTRY INC — $20,200 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,537 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetKINGS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $7,955 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFAIRFIELD FOOD PANTRY — $7,813 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetMCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED — $7,471 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CENTER — $5,200 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE NEW PATH INC — $3,381 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC — $2,793 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN PRIME — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE HUNGRY PROJECT — $1,098 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $792 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE MIAMI FOOD SERVICES INC — $200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEEDY BASKET OF SOUTHERN MIAMI CO — $200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEBANON FOOD PANTRY — $200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP — $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOOD PANTRY INC — $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTOPSS — $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHALL HIGH SCHOOL — $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUND BY FAITH INC — $100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF MIDDLETOWN — $100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSELF SUSTAINING ENTERPRISES INC — $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT LAKOTA INC — $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY ABUSE SHELTER OF MIAMI COUNTY INC — $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HOUSING OHIO INC — $100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN INC — $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIRST PLACE FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds LINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds KINGS LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds MCCULLOUGH-HYDE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds BETHANY CENTER
  • Who funds THE NEW PATH INC
  • Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN PRIME
  • Who funds FEED THE HUNGRY PROJECT
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds FRANKLIN AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds LITTLE MIAMI FOOD SERVICES INC
  • Who funds NEEDY BASKET OF SOUTHERN MIAMI CO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH29.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · United Way of Miami County Ohio · Butler County United Way · Upper Valley Medical Center · Caring Partners International Inc · The Troy Foundation · The Paul G Duke Foundation · United Way of Warren County Ohio · Hamilton Community Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Darke County United Way Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph