· Public charity
Upper Valley Medical Center
We care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+5 grants · $6.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EDISON COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $3,000,090 |
| PIQUA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $2,000,150 |
| TROY FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| TROY CHRISTIAN ATHLETIC BOOSTERS | $500,000 |
| THE VILLAGE OF COVINGTON | $326,250 |
| CITY OF TIPP CITY | $222,213 |
| SAMARITAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH | $171,250 |
| MIAMI COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC | $166,700 |
| HEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC | $150,135 |
| TROY MIAMI COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $128,500 |
| LINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER | $115,685 |
| TCN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC | $92,000 |
| MIAMI COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT | $89,349 |
| THE ARBOGAST PERFORMING ART CENTER | $87,545 |
| MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL | $67,953 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMiami County YMCA4× · 2017–2022 · $6.0M · revenue +9% · 98% of their budget
- LCLINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER5× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +31% · 30% of their budget
- TCTROY CHRISTIAN ATHLETIC BOOSTERS2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +74% · 83% of their budget
Funded once
- CDCITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.5M · revenue +254%
- MEMIAMI EAST LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $540k
- PCPIQUA CITY SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $375k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chamber is a member association designed to be the leading advocate for the business community of the greater dayton region. its mission is to work shoulder to shoulder with businesses to help them succeed.
We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.
Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…
Our mission is to be the leader in providing quality healthcare services that meet the needs and exceed the expectations of our customers
To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.
The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…
The hospital council of northwest ohio is a member-driven organization that represents and advocates on behalf of its member hospitals and health systems, and provides collaborative opportunities to enhance the health status of the…
We will improve the health of the communities we serve with others who share our commitment to provide high-quality, cost-competitive healthcare services.
We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.
Provide home or nursing home care for terminally ill patients and their families. provided education & support to fayette county and surrounding communities about qualify of life issues.
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area and the most unlike its peers is American Legion 184 Schnell Westfall Post. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARBOGAST PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds PIQUA AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CITYWIDE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds THE TROY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONEFIFTEEN RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds TROY CHRISTIAN ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MIAMI COUNTY RECOVERY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds TCN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FIVE RIVERS HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ABUSE SHELTER OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDISON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TROY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PREMIER COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DAYTON FOUNDATION DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds YWCA PIQUA OHIO ↗
- Who funds UVMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAINT PATRICK SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF PIQUA INC ↗
- Who funds TROY MAIN STREET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Troy Foundation · The Paul G Duke Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Miami Valley Hospital · United Way of Miami County Ohio · Piqua Community Foundation · Dayton Foundation Depository · Atrium Medical Center · The Niels a Lundgard and Ruth Lundgard · Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn · Mathile Family Foundation · Dayton Foundation Plus Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Upper Valley Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.