· Public charity
Darke County United Way Inc
To increase the capacity to care for one another.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $374,023 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $385,856 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,833 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $311k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORS-GATEWAY YOUTH | $56,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLE | $45,000 |
| 20242025 DESIGNATIONS | $34,023 |
| CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE CO | $32,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $28,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $27,600 |
| CORS-ACES | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY UNITY | $25,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $17,000 |
| GRACE RESURRECTION ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| RECOVERY & WELLNESS OF MIDWEST OH | $14,000 |
| BRIDGES TO COLLEGE | $13,300 |
| EMPOWERING DARKE COUNTY YOUTH | $13,100 |
| DARKE COUNTY SENIOR OUTREACH | $11,500 |
| DARKE COUNTY YMCA - CHILDCARE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $334k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCOUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +24%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC9× · 2017–2025 · $316k · revenue +84% · 71% of their budget
- CACANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +54% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- 2D2223 DESIGNATIONSone grant, 2023 · $43k
- 2D20232024 DESIGNATIONSone grant, 2024 · $40k
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEEone grant, 2020 · $36k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prevention of drug & alcohol abuse and provide mental health services.
Provide resources for low income clients.
The organization operates a senior citizen's center in greenbrier county west virgnia. senior citizens are provided with transportation, nutrition, in-home care and other personal and social services.
Community food pantry
To serve the elderly.
The council promotes independence and quality of life for greene county senior citizens by facilitating and supporting the development, implementation, and continual improvement of a comprehensive and coordinated system of contact and care.
Provide primary health care services for low-income individuals by managing & operating a health facility & its programs for all darke county residents.
To help the general welfare of the community by providing services to the elderly and low income persons in oldham, trimble, and henry counties in ky.
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
Social welfare organization
Provide meals, clothing, counseling, referrals, spiritual guidance and shelter to anyone in need without charge
Provide services for elderly
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Social Services of the Miami Valley and the most unlike its peers is Cancer Association of Darke County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COUNCIL ON RURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREENVILLEINC ↗
- Who funds CANCER ASSOCIATION OF DARKE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds GRACE RESURRECTION ASSN FOR CHRISTIAN ENDEAVORS ↗
- Who funds MIAMI VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds DARKE COUNTY YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE MIAMI VALLEY ↗
- Who funds FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR MEDICAL EMERGERCIES INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE FISH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Harry D Stephens Memorial Inc · Ketrow Foundation · Lydia Schaurer Memorial Trust Fund · Shared Harvest Foodbank Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Darke County United Way Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.