· Public charity
Intermountain Front Range Inc
Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $1,464,015 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,976,781 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $512,766 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $901,070 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $365,445 |
| BENEFITS IN ACTION | $96,000 |
| JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH | $35,000 |
| SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER | $15,000 |
| VIA MOBILITY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| ST LOUIS CATHOLIC PARISH IN LOUISVILLE | $8,700 |
| COAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS | $8,000 |
| A PRECIOUS CHILD INC | $7,500 |
| COLORADO PERSONALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR PHYSICIANS | $6,000 |
| BROOMFIELD FISH | $5,800 |
| MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $625k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $5.7M · revenue +142% · 29% of their budget
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc3× · 2017–2020 · $248k · revenue +33%
- MCMETRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC6× · 2017–2022 · $235k · revenue +24%
Funded once
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCone grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +2%
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +168%- BGBig Greenone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -29%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Prime health advances health justice, equity, access quality and cost through innovation, collaboration, and community building.
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
To provide equitable primary health care and resources to those with limited access across colorado, especially to those who are uninsured.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…
Cbhc's mission is to support community resilience, guide behavioral health innovation, and enhance individual well-being throughout colorado by supporting colorado's community behavioral health safety net providers.
Vail health services is the parent company of a group of companies generally known as vail health, whose mission is to elevate health across our mountain communities.
Healthteamworks collaboratively transforms health care through performance improvement, organization development, and training, resulting in strengthened communities and person-centered, high-quality care.
To provide primary health care to those in need by offering top quality care through accessibility, leadership, and financial independence.
To encircle those facing advanced illness with unprecedented levels of comfort, compassion, and expertise.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Interfaith Network On Mental Illness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds METRO COMMUNITY PROVIDER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds BENEFITS IN ACTION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Via Mobility Services ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CLINICA CAMPESINA FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF BOULDER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AMERICANS CENTER FOR FINANCIAL EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Hospital Sisters Mission Outreach Corporation ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD ↗
- Who funds Big Green ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SENIORS' RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARVADA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds Mending Faces ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT ST VINCENT HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER PRIDE ↗
- Who funds BICYCLE COLORADO ↗
- Who funds WOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM WORLD OF WONDER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO RAILROAD HISTORICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARAPAHOE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT INTERNATIONALE ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH NETWORK ON MENTAL ILLNESS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY REACH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds METRO CRISIS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI Boulder County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Community Foundation Boulder County · Nextfifty Initiative · Daniels Fund · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Anschutz Family Foundation · Broomfield Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Intermountain Front Range Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Catholic Charities of Central Florida Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.