Skip to content
Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc

Schuyler center for analysis and advocacy is dedicated to shaping and advancing public policy solutions that improve the well-being of disenfranchised new york state residents.

$584k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$122k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.4MPublic Benefit$446kHealth$370kEducation$311kEmployment$133kScience & Tech$103kCrime & Legal$74kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $563,300, the rows itemized in this filing. The $583,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $20,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
$62,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA$121,500
AVOQ$103,000
HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA$75,600
PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND$63,500
HEALTH RESEARCH INC$62,500
WESTERN NEW YORK CHILD CARE ACTION$40,200
THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN$38,300
RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CTR UNITED$27,500
DAYCARE COUNCIL OF NY$26,000
YOUTH FX$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $908k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER: $80k → 9%THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA: $176k → 14%DAYCARE COUNCIL OF NY: $26k → 17%SOUTHERN TIER INDEPENDENCE: $13k → 20%THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA: $123k → 14%DAYCARE COUNCIL OF NY: $14k → 17%Southern Tier Independence Center: $12k → 20%THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA: $122k → 14%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SUFFOLK CTY: $75k → 7%THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA: $102k → 14%CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF SUFFOLK COUNT: $15k → 7%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN: $52k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN: $45k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN: $38k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 15 repeat orgs$394k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
8

Total granted

$2.5M
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+0%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Children's Agenda Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $522k · revenue +32%
  • HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $234k · revenue +28%
  • TC
    THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue +11%
  • Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
    one grant, 2024 · $38k · revenue 0%
  • PP
    PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc

Schuyler center for analysis and advocacy is dedicated to shaping and advancing public policy solutions that improve the well-being of disenfranchised new york state residents.

Public Benefit
2
Child Care Council Inc

Child Care Council is a Child Care Aware Quality Assured agency that provides information, training, and resources to child care providers and parents in Livingston, Monroe, and Wayne counties near Rochester, New York.

—
3
Child Care Council of Nassau Inc

The Child Care Council of Nassau envisions a future where every family in Nassau County can access high quality early learning. we empower familes with resources to make informed child care choices, strenghen the early childhood educator…

Human Services
4
New York State Childrens' Alliance Inc

The new york state children's alliance is an organization created to promote the development,growth, and continuation of multidisciplinary teams and child advocacy centers throughout new york state in order to better serve abused and…

Crime & Legal
5
Community Action Planning Council of Jefferson County Inc

Community action planning council assists, supports, and empowers people through diverse programs designed to alleviate poverty, promote self-sufficiency, and advance community prosperity.

Human Services
6
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
7
Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Association of New York State Inc

Support consumer-directed personal assistance fiscal intermediaries and users in all counties of new york state, providing assistance including, but not limited to advocacy, systems change, promotion of consumer control and self…

Human Services
8
Health and Welfare Council of Long Island Inc

Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them

Health
9
Advance Care Alliance of Ny Inc

Advance care alliance of new york, inc. (acany) is dedicated to providing the support and services for you or your loved one with an intellectual or developmental disability need to lead an active, healthy, and fulfilling life. acany was…

Human Services
10
The Child Study Center of New York

To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.

—
11
Child Care Network of New York Inc

The organization was founded with the purpose of promoting quality child care services by serving as a resource for all child care related issues for nyc families, children, and child care professionals.

Human Services
12
Li Child and Family Development Services Inc

L. I. Child and Family Development Services, Inc., dba Long Island Head Start (the "Agency") is a private, non-profit corporation, which administers publicly funded early childhood education and development programs in Suffolk County, New…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prevent Child Abuse New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Center for Children's Initiatives Inc: $317,500 · OtherCenter for Children's Initiatives IncHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $233,800 · OtherHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INCRESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC: $117,500 · OtherRESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED…WESTERN NEW YORK CHILD CARE ACTION: $110,400 · OtherWESTERN NEW YORK CHILD CARE ACTIONAVOQ: $103,000 · OtherAVOQPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND: $37,500 · Other+4 more: $64,638 · Other+4 moreThe Children's Agenda Inc: $522,100 · Human ServicesThe Children's Agenda IncTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $150,300 · Human ServicesTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN …Child Care Council of Suffolk Inc: $90,000 · Human ServicesChild Care Council of Suffolk IncCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER IN…DAY CARE COUNCIL OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 · Human Services+1 more: $25,438 · Human ServicesPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $371,100 · Public BenefitPUBLIC POLICY AN…Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: $37,500 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget…ALLIANCE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $311,000 · Youth DevelopmentALLIANCE FOR…HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $87,500 · HealthCommunity Health Care Association of New York State Inc: $25,000 · HealthTHE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC: $23,250 · HealthPREVENT CHILD ABUSE NEW YORK INC: $38,000 · Crime & LegalTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $35,875 · Crime & LegalHUNGER ACTION NETWORK OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$984,338Human Services$907,838Public Benefit$408,600Youth Development$311,000Health$135,750Crime & Legal$73,875Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Children's Agenda Inc: $522,100 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $371,100 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCenter for Children's Initiatives Inc: $317,500 over 4y, 56% of budgetALLIANCE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC: $311,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetHEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC: $233,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $150,300 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC: $117,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetChild Care Council of Suffolk Inc: $90,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $87,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDAY CARE COUNCIL OF NEW YORK INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE NEW YORK INC: $38,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities: $37,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $35,875 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUNGER ACTION NETWORK OF NEW YORK STATE INC: $30,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSOUTHERN TIER INDEPENDENCE CENTER INC: $25,438 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Health Care Association of New York State Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK STATE LABOR-RELIGION COALITION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC: $23,250 over 3y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Education Trust I…Robin Hood FoundationPublic Policy and Edu…Community Service Soc…Health Foundation for…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Education Trust IncDC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Education Trust Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Public Policy and Education Fund of New York Inc · Community Service Society of New York · Health Foundation for Western & Central New York · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home