· Public charity
Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc
Schuyler center for analysis and advocacy is dedicated to shaping and advancing public policy solutions that improve the well-being of disenfranchised new york state residents.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $563,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $583,800 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $426k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA | $121,500 |
| AVOQ | $103,000 |
| HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA | $75,600 |
| PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND | $63,500 |
| HEALTH RESEARCH INC | $62,500 |
| WESTERN NEW YORK CHILD CARE ACTION | $40,200 |
| THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN | $38,300 |
| RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CTR UNITED | $27,500 |
| DAYCARE COUNCIL OF NY | $26,000 |
| YOUTH FX | $5,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $908k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe Children's Agenda Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $522k · revenue +31%
HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $234k · revenue +28%- TCTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC4× · 2022–2025 · $150k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- CCCHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INCone grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue +11%
- PPPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUNDone grant, 2018 · $38k
Center on Budget and Policy Prioritiesone grant, 2024 · $38k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Schuyler center for analysis and advocacy is dedicated to shaping and advancing public policy solutions that improve the well-being of disenfranchised new york state residents.
Child Care Council is a Child Care Aware Quality Assured agency that provides information, training, and resources to child care providers and parents in Livingston, Monroe, and Wayne counties near Rochester, New York.
The Child Care Council of Nassau envisions a future where every family in Nassau County can access high quality early learning. we empower familes with resources to make informed child care choices, strenghen the early childhood educator…
The new york state children's alliance is an organization created to promote the development,growth, and continuation of multidisciplinary teams and child advocacy centers throughout new york state in order to better serve abused and…
Community action planning council assists, supports, and empowers people through diverse programs designed to alleviate poverty, promote self-sufficiency, and advance community prosperity.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
Support consumer-directed personal assistance fiscal intermediaries and users in all counties of new york state, providing assistance including, but not limited to advocacy, systems change, promotion of consumer control and self…
Serve the most vulnerable on li by convening and supporting agencies that serve them
Advance care alliance of new york, inc. (acany) is dedicated to providing the support and services for you or your loved one with an intellectual or developmental disability need to lead an active, healthy, and fulfilling life. acany was…
To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.
The organization was founded with the purpose of promoting quality child care services by serving as a resource for all child care related issues for nyc families, children, and child care professionals.
L. I. Child and Family Development Services, Inc., dba Long Island Head Start (the "Agency") is a private, non-profit corporation, which administers publicly funded early childhood education and development programs in Suffolk County, New…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prevent Child Abuse New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Children's Agenda Inc ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Children's Initiatives Inc ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR QUALITY EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTH FEDERATION OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Child Care Council of Suffolk Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD CARE COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds DAY CARE COUNCIL OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER ACTION NETWORK OF NEW YORK STATE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN TIER INDEPENDENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health Care Association of New York State Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATE LABOR-RELIGION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSTPARTUM RESOURCE CENTER OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STATEWIDE SENIOR ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Education Trust Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Public Policy and Education Fund of New York Inc · Community Service Society of New York · Health Foundation for Western & Central New York · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schuyler Center for Analysis and Advocacy Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.