Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

The Education Trust Inc

EdTrust is committed to advancing policies and practices to dismantle the racial and economic barriers embedded in the American education system.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$158k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$6.9MHuman Services$1.4MCivil Rights$1.3MPhilanthropy$938kCommunity Improvement$750kYouth Development$605kPublic Benefit$587kReligion$421kOther$0
02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $431k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $1.7M
$60,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$77M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Education Resource Strategies Inc$158,333
Education Counsel$121,834
San Joaquin County Office of Education$80,000
California Mathematics Council$80,000
All4Ed$77,500
National Urban League Inc$77,500
UnidosUS$77,500
National Parents Union$77,500
Migration Policy Institute$75,000
Center for American Progress$75,000
SchoolHouse Connection$75,000
National Center for Learning Disabilities Inc$75,000
Educators for Excellence$75,000
Los Angeles United Methodist Urban Foundation (Kid City Hope)$70,000
California Community Colleges Calworks Association$70,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Urban League of Westchester County: $20k → 9%Docs for Tots: $15k → 13%The Children's Agenda Inc: $100k → 14%For Oak Cliff: $10k → 14%Detroit Parent Network: $30k → 21%UNITE Inc: $43k → 21%United Ways of Tennessee: $10k → 9%CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE: $55k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY: $20k → 9%Docs for Tots: $15k → 13%The Children's Agenda Inc: $100k → 14%DETROIT PARENT NETWORK: $15k → 21%Centro Hispano de East Tennessee: $15k → 12%Urban League of Westchester County: $20k → 9%The Children's Agenda Inc: $50k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S AGENDA INC: $50k → 14%Pivot Learning Partners: $130k → 10%DOCS FOR TOTS: $11k → 6%Pivot Learning Partners: $130k → 10%Urban League of Rochester NY Inc: $30k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $85k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $25k → 14%National Parents Union: $78k → 8%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $25k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $30k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $24k → 14%Tennessee Disability Coalition: $30k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $13k → 10%Urban League of Rochester NY Inc: $20k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC: $20k → 14%Urban League of Rochester NY Inc: $13k → 14%Buffalo Urban League: $30k → 13%California Community Colleges Calworks Association: $70k → 14%Proyecto Pastoral at Dolores Mission: $20k → 14%BUFFALO URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 13%BUFFALO URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 13%Buffalo Urban League: $20k → 13%BUFFALO URBAN LEAGUE INC: $20k → 13%National Urban League Inc: $78k → 17%National Urban League Inc: $43k → 17%Committee for Hispanic Children & Families: $30k → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $28k → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $25k → 17%Leadership for Educational Equity Foundation: $25k → 17%COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $25k → 17%Committee for Hispanic Children & Families: $23k → 17%Committee for Hispanic Children & Families: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 78 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

78 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
81

Total granted

$10M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+11%

Still filing today

92%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $899k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ER
    EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +40%
  • PF
    PARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $366k · revenue +22%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $310k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA COMPETESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +29%
  • TN
    The New Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $104k · revenue +35%
  • CV
    CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOLARS
    one grant, 2023 · $80k · revenue -17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Urban Assembly Inc

To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.

International
2
Families in Schools

To ensure student success by building authentic partnerships between families, educators, and system leaders, and through parent-led advocacy.

Education
3
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
4
Innovate Public Schools

Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.

Philanthropy
5
National Alliance of Concurrent Enrollment Partnerships Inc

Advancing a national community to foster equity in dual and concurrent enrollment through accreditation, advocacy, research, and professional development.

Education
6
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
7
Deans for Impact

See Schedule ODeans for Impact supports educator-preparation programs to bring the science of learning into teaching practice; partners with policymakers to ensure pathways into teaching are accessible, practice-based, and…

Education
8
Leading Educators Inc

Leading educators partners with school systems to build and sustain the conditions, teaching, and leadership to ensure that the students furthest from opportunity succeed in school and in life.

Education
9
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
10
Childhood Education International

To promote innovative solutions to education challenges and inspire action that creates positive, sustainable futures for children and youth worldwide

—
11
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
12
School Board School

At School Board School, we are activating a diverse coalition of education advocates and aspiring school board members to create significant and sustainable change in their school system. We prepare them with the skills, mindsets,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nashville Teacher Residency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportSchool District FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Women & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Youth Development CentersMilitary Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community College Foundatio…Affordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/181
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,384

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 181 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
155/160
Grantees still filing
101/160
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INC — $2,103,557 · EducationEDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INCCALIFORNIA COMPETES — $500,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA COMPETESPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS — $365,876 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLSTEACH PLUS INC — $281,750 · EducationCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER — $272,585 · EducationPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $208,125 · Education+45 more — $2,291,866 · Education+45 moreLOS ANGELES URBAN FOUDATION — $170,424 · OtherUNIDOSUS — $153,816 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION — $145,000 · OtherTHE NEW YORK URBAN LEAGUE INC — $130,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $125,000 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC — $123,335 · OtherEducationCounsel LLC — $121,834 · OtherCONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT — $246,424 · OtherCONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR P…SCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY INC — $300,000 · OtherSCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS …+61 more — $1,990,122 · Other+61 moreThe Children's Agenda Inc — $310,000 · Human ServicesThe Children's Ag…CHILDREN NOW — $260,876 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWTIDES CENTER — $178,333 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC — $166,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF R…THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $160,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMITTEE FOR…BUFFALO URBAN LEAGUE INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesBUFFALO URBAN LEA…NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $135,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN LE…CENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE — $90,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL PARENTS UNION INC — $77,500 · Human ServicesCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CALWORKS ASSOCIATION — $70,000 · Human Services+20 more — $391,000 · Human Services+20 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $310,091 · Community ImprovementALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY — $196,780 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $52,250 · Community ImprovementURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA — $40,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $17,500 · Community ImprovementRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE — $191,375 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $173,750 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY — $75,000 · PhilanthropyCHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyYouth Together Inc — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentFuture Leaders of America — $79,091 · Youth DevelopmentCOLLABORATIVE FOR ACADEMIC SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL LEARNING — $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTAND FOR CHILDREN LEADERSHIP CENTER INC — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMERICA'S PROMISE THE ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH — $42,500 · Youth DevelopmentCouncil of Parent Attorneys and Advocates Inc — $33,332 · Youth DevelopmentADELANTE STUDENT VOICES INC — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC — $15,000 · Youth Development+2 more — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $123,334 · Civil RightsYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $103,000 · Civil RightsCalifornians For Justice Education Fund — $75,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $75,000 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $40,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $18,250 · Civil Rights
Education$6,023,759Other$3,505,955Human Services$2,058,709Community Improvement$616,621Philanthropy$520,125Youth Development$448,923Civil Rights$434,584

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDUCATION RESOURCE STRATEGIES INC — $2,103,557 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMPETES — $500,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR LOS ANGELES SCHOOLS — $365,876 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $310,091 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Agenda Inc — $310,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetSCHUYLER CENTER FOR ANALYSIS AND ADVOCACY INC — $300,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetTEACH PLUS INC — $281,750 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCALIFORNIANS TOGETHER — $272,585 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $260,876 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT — $246,424 over 6y, 13% of budgetPRICHARD COMMITTEE FOR ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE INC — $208,125 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A BETTER COMMUNITY — $196,780 over 4y, 12% of budgetRODEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION - DE — $191,375 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $178,333 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY — $173,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES URBAN FOUDATION — $170,424 over 5y, 11% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ROCHESTER NY INC — $166,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $160,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBLU Educational Foundation — $158,091 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $153,816 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetENGLISH LEARNERS SUCCESS FORUM — $140,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetBUFFALO URBAN LEAGUE INC — $140,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $135,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK URBAN LEAGUE INC — $130,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC — $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC — $123,335 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMIGRATION POLICY INSTITUTE — $123,334 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetYouth Together Inc — $115,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $114,750 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetThe New School — $104,309 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG INVINCIBLES — $103,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetUNBOUNDED LEARNING INC — $95,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR EXCELLENT EDUCATION INC — $92,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO DE EAST TENNESSEE — $90,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSCHOOLHOUSE CONNECTION — $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMISSION GRADUATES — $88,591 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $86,591 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTennessee Educators of Color Alliance N — $85,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetDIVERSE LEARNERS COOPERATIVE — $85,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetCalifornia State Student Association — $80,833 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC — $80,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY SCHOLARS — $80,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetWest Contra Costa Public Education Fund — $80,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBLACK CALIFORNIANS UNITED FOR EARLY CARE AND EDUCATION — $80,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBLACK EDUCATOR ADVOCATES NETWORK — $80,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetLATINO EDUCATION ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFuture Leaders of America — $79,091 over 4y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationThe Sobrato Family Fo…Carnegie Corporation …The William & Flora H…Elbridge Stuart Found…The California Endowm…Raikes FoundationWalton Family Foundat…The Joyce FoundationThe Heising-Simons Fo…UnidosusWK Kellogg Foundation
Gates FoundationWA52.6× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · The California Endowment · Raikes Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · The Joyce Foundation · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Unidosus · WK Kellogg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Education Trust Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Urban League of Greater Springfield Inc — 81% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Arts Education in Maryland Schools Alliance Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Rodel Charitable Foundation - De — 20% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Identity Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Education Resource Strategies Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Worcester State Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 181 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines