· Private foundation
Schoenhut Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k96 grants · $83k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARISH OF ST TERESA OF CALCUTTA | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME | $10,000 |
| THE HAYGROUND SCHOOL INC | $8,554 |
| DAI FRIENDS & ALUMNI ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| CLARKSON UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| ST ANDREW CHURCH | $5,000 |
| DEBRA OF AMERICA | $5,000 |
| ANNUAL CATHOLIC APPEAL | $3,500 |
| CHAMINADE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC | $2,500 |
| HERMANSKY-PUDLAK SYNDROME NETWORK | $2,500 |
| ST TERESA OF AVILA CHURCH | $2,000 |
| RENSSELAER FALLS CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| PLAY LIKE A CHAMPION TODAY EDUCATIONAL SERIES INC | $2,000 |
| GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION | $1,950 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Schoenhut Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
116 repeat relationships — 80 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Trustees of Tufts College8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +50%- SFST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $28k · revenue +73%
- DEDYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- BHBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue -52%
- DFDAI FRIENDS & ALUMNI GRANTone grant, 2022 · $5k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME THE SORIN FOUNDER'S SOCIETYone grant, 2022 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Impact Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adam Cirillo Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HERMANSKY PUDLAK SYNDROME NETWORK ↗
- Who funds PLAY LIKE A CHAMPION TODAY EDUCATIONAL SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds HAYGROUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAMINADE DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ONE TO WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds The Academy of Our Lady of Peace Foundation ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY CHILDRENS HELP ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds BERKELEY HEIGHTS RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Manasquan Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Viking Global Foundation Inc · Mutual of America Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Firstenergy Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schoenhut Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center in Asbury Park Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Arc of Litchfield County Inc — 97% of income from government
- Homework House Inc — 38% of income from government
- Mercy Center Corporation — 21% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Summit Downtown Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.