Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schnieders Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.1MInternational$1.7MEducation$1.1MArts & Culture$1.1MHealth$813kCivil Rights$792kFood & Nutrition$578kHuman Services$335kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART$1,000,000
GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION$1,000,000
ST PAUL ACADEMY$50,000
TWIN CITIES PBS$30,000
FRIENDS SCHOOL OF MN$25,000
GROVES ACADEMY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMO FRIENDS$10,000
URBAN ROOTS$5,000
KEYSTONE COMMUNITY SERVICE$2,000
GREYWOLF PRESS$2,000
COFFEE HOUSE PRESS$2,000
MILKWEED EDITIONS$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $372k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%THINK NEW MEXICO: $5k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $5k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $5k → 12%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $100k → 14%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $76k → 14%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $50k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $50k → 14%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $10k → 11%APPETITE FOR CHANGE: $4k → 11%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
NY
OR
IA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 45 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

45 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
31

Total granted

$10M
$995k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

84%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EARTHJUSTICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +82%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +98%
  • MS
    MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    5× · 2018–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue +48%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
    one grant, 2017 · $250k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
2
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
3
Environmental Initiative

Catalyze collaboration across perspectives, power, and systems for social equity and environmental health.

Environment
4
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
5
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
6
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
7
Minnesota Fringe Festival

Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.

Arts & Culture
8
The Santa Fe Opera

To further the operatic art form by presenting ensemble performances of the highest quality in a varied repertoire of new as well as rarely performed and standard works, to ensure excellence of opera's future through its apprentice…

Arts & Culture
9
Sustainable Farming Association of Minnesota

Support the development and enhancement of sustainable farming systems through farmer-to-farmer networking, innovation, demonstration, and education.

Food & Nutrition
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
11
Minnesota Environmental Partnership

The minnesota environmental partnership is a coalition that strengthens member effectiveness and builds collective power to secure a healthy environment for all minnesotans.

Environment
12
Land Stewardship Project

The land stewardship project (lsp) was organized on june 1, 1982, as a division of the national catholic rural life conference and in 1983 was incorporated under the minnesota (mn) nonprofit corporation act. lsp is supported primarily by…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts Dba Minneapolis Institute of Arts; the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/66
Grantees still filing
42/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS SANTA FE: $605,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS SANTA FEPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $550,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODDIG DEEP: $300,000 · OtherDIG DEEPAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $250,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONYOUTH WORKS: $125,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS CENTER FOR: $125,000 · OtherPRACTICAL FARMERS OF IOWA: $115,000 · OtherSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $234,360 · OtherSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONSEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC: $170,000 · Other+35 more: $745,185 · Other+35 moreMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1,036,000 · Arts & CultureMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF…GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $1,015,000 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDA…+13 more: $224,200 · Arts & Culture+13 moreEARTHJUSTICE: $1,750,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEREUNITY RESOURCES: $300,000 · EnvironmentREUNITY RESOURCES+6 more: $68,500 · EnvironmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,450,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $250,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATI…+1 more: $50,000 · InternationalNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $825,000 · EducationNEW MEXICO SC…New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $210,000 · EducationNew Mexico St…FRIENDS SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA: $185,000 · EducationFRIENDS SCHOO…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS…+4 more: $55,000 · EducationSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $510,000 · Crime & LegalNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $276,000 · Human ServicesAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $44,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHINK NEW MEXICO: $15,000 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $15,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human Services
Other$3,219,545Arts & Culture$2,275,200Environment$2,118,500International$1,750,000Education$1,375,000Crime & Legal$510,000Human Services$372,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $1,750,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,450,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $1,036,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $1,015,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE: $825,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $510,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetREUNITY RESOURCES: $300,000 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $276,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $234,360 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc: $210,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA: $185,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetSEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC: $170,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetPRACTICAL FARMERS OF IOWA: $115,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHEN ANGELS INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOGRO MOBILE GROCERY: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetLake Street Council: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEARTH University Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society: $47,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAPPETITE FOR CHANGE INC: $44,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetQUIVIRA COALITION INC: $43,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED: $22,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetStone Barns Restoration Corp DBA Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCIRCUS OF THE STAR: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNDS PARK ACADEMY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE HEARTLAND: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO: $15,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREAT RIVER GREENING: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMO FRIENDS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOMOS UNIDOS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHEALTHY ISLAND PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE SEEDSSOUTHWESTERN ENDANGERED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds REUNITY RESOURCES ↗
  • Who funds DIG DEEP ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SCHOOL OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds SEED SAVERS EXCHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRACTICAL FARMERS OF IOWA ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN ANGELS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
  • Who funds MOGRO MOBILE GROCERY ↗
  • Who funds Lake Street Council ↗
  • Who funds EARTH University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra Society ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
  • Who funds APPETITE FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds QUIVIRA COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILIA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM35.1× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Abeles Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Patagoniaorg

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schnieders Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schnieders Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Schnieders Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Schnieders Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schnieders Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph