Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Satya and Rao Remala Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$987k
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$504k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$2.5MHealth$1.8MEducation$962kInternational$216kEmployment$188kScience & Tech$160kHuman Services$132kArts & Culture$106kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k54 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $149k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $253k
  • $250k+1 grant · $504k
$1,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$503,698
IIT KANPUR FOUNDATION$156,250
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$97,185
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$48,000
NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH$25,000
FARESTART$20,000
PRATHAM USA$15,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$10,500
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION$10,000
API CHAYA$10,000
SEEDS FOR PROGRESS FOUNDATION$10,000
TUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH AND FREEDOM$9,857
GIDDENS SCHOOL$5,000
MANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$5,000
BOOGER FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $97k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 7%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $855 → 7%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $750 → 7%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $600 → 7%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%SOPHIA WAY: $1k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $3k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $500 → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $5k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB CHARITY: $500 → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $500 → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB CHARITY: $500 → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $500 → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $500 → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $500 → 9%MILLIONAIR CLUB CHARITY: $500 → 9%WELL SPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%SEATTLE INDIAN CENTER: $1k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $1k → 9%CHILDCARE RESOURCES: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $5k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $3k → 9%KANDELIA: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Satya and Rao Remala Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Satya and Rao Remala Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 110 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

110 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

110
92

Total granted

$4.4M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+33%

Still filing today

70%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +27%
  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $188k · revenue +25%
  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $177k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • WF
    WELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • GIRLS WHO CODE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +84%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
3
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
4
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
5
Disability Rights Washington

Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.

Human Services
6
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
7
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
8
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
9
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
10
Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture
11
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
12
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Seattle Indian Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Christian Missionary Organi…Community College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsLocal History MuseumsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%4%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr18%26%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr15%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr18%22%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr15%59%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/150
the rest of the field
12%
4,742/38,818

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 219 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
138/141
Grantees still filing
99/141
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,696,772 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $736,006 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTYPRATHAM USA — $177,248 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USA+6 more — $34,626 · PhilanthropyFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $1,405,475 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $363,416 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONIIT KANPUR FOUNDATION — $157,350 · OtherIIT KANPUR FOUNDATIONFOREST RIDGE SCHOOL — $132,000 · Other+121 more — $682,962 · Other+121 moreOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $187,921 · HealthTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM — $47,357 · HealthNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH — $33,650 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $29,496 · HealthMANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $28,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $20,376 · Health+12 more — $17,605 · HealthGiddens School — $66,801 · EducationZeno — $44,296 · EducationAlliance for Education — $17,310 · EducationThe George Washington University — $16,000 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARS — $11,500 · EducationGreen Dot Public Schools — $9,500 · EducationVILLAGEREACH — $8,000 · Education+8 more — $17,130 · EducationFARESTART — $168,500 · Employment+1 more — $5,000 · EmploymentUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES — $23,815 · InternationalSeeds For Progress Foundation Inc — $20,000 · InternationalKay Tita — $15,114 · InternationalPATH — $15,000 · InternationalKiran Anjali Project — $12,080 · InternationalCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE — $6,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $5,150 · International+6 more — $6,562 · InternationalRwanda Girls Initiative — $19,193 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES — $11,143 · Human ServicesGLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES — $10,500 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK — $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE — $8,000 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWEST — $4,000 · Human ServicesTHE SOPHIA WAY — $3,500 · Human ServicesFORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND — $3,405 · Human Services+8 more — $7,499 · Human Services
Philanthropy$2,644,652Other$2,741,203Health$364,405Education$190,537Employment$173,500International$104,221Human Services$97,240

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,696,772 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER — $1,405,475 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY — $736,006 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $187,921 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $177,248 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFARESTART — $168,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetGiddens School — $66,801 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDHAVEN — $55,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMaris Place — $50,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM — $47,357 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetZeno — $44,296 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetAPI CHAYA — $38,225 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH — $33,650 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $29,496 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $28,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY — $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc — $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMPLIO NETWORK — $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES — $23,815 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $20,376 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSeeds For Progress Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRwanda Girls Initiative — $19,193 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY — $18,513 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION — $17,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Education — $17,310 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPATH — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArts Corps — $13,242 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKiran Anjali Project — $12,080 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS — $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBELONG Partners — $11,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES — $11,143 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES — $10,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM — $10,420 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK — $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools — $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGEREACH — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNISQUALLY LAND TRUST — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTHCARE — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBooger Fund — $7,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON — $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds Giddens School ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds Zeno ↗
  • Who funds API CHAYA ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds MANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMPLIO NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds UPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Seeds For Progress Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Rwanda Girls Initiative ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Kay Tita ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds Arts Corps ↗
  • Who funds Kiran Anjali Project ↗
  • Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…United Way of King Co…Gates FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…Medina FoundationGrousemont FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…Liberty Mutual Founda…Moccasin Lake Foundat…McKinstry Charitable …
Seattle FoundationWA72.9× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Gates Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Medina Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Moccasin Lake Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Satya and Rao Remala Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Satya and Rao Remala Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Satya and Rao Remala Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 219 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines