Skip to content
Satya and Rao Remala Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Satya and Rao Remala Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
79
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$561k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$2.5MHealth$1.8MEducation$962kInternational$216kEmployment$188kScience & Tech$160kHuman Services$132kArts & Culture$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 79 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k56 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $261k
  • $250k+1 grant · $561k
$1,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$24M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAFGIVING 360$561,208
OVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER$160,000
Individual grant recipient$101,000
TUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH AND FREEDOM$35,000
NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH$35,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$25,100
WASHINGTON STATE OPPORTUNITY SCHOLARSHIP$25,000
PRATHAM USA$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$18,000
INDIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE$15,000
API CHAYA$15,000
FARESTART$15,000
ASSOCIATED RECREATION COUNCIL$10,005
MANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$10,000
VIRGINIA MASON FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 7%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $1k → 7%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $855 → 7%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $500 → 17%FORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $750 → 7%GIRLS WHO CODE: $10k → 17%FORGOTTEN CHILDREN'S FUND: $600 → 7%SOPHIA WAY: $1k → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%THE SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%SOPHIA WAY: $500 → 9%HOPELINK: $3k → 9%HOPELINK: $2k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%HOPELINK: $1k → 9%AKIN: $1k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $500 → 9%ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $5k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $3k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE: $1k → 9%UPLIFT NORTHWEST: $500 → 9%WELL SPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $5k → 9%SEATTLE INDIAN CENTER: $1k → 9%OPEN ARMS' PERINATAL SERVICES: $1k → 9%CHILDCARE RESOURCES: $1k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $5k → 9%UNIVERSITY DISTRICT FOOD BANK: $5k → 9%YOUTH CARE: $3k → 9%KANDELIA: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Satya and Rao Remala Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Satya and Rao Remala Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.9M · 120 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

120 repeat relationships: 57 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

120
92

Total granted

$4.9M
$156k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+17%

Still filing today

69%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $197k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +27%
  • PU
    PRATHAM USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +20%
  • OH
    OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $188k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • GIRLS WHO CODE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +84%
  • W
    WELLSPRING
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +66%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
2
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
3
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
4
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
5
Seattle International Foundation

Seattle international foundation (sif) champions equity and rule of law in central america through good governance and a robust civil society. sif works with other donors to the region to increase philanthropy and to promote collaboration,…

Philanthropy
6
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
7
Humanities Washington

Humanities washington (hw) opens minds and bridges divides by creating spaces to explore different perspectives. we envision a state where all people seek a deeper understanding of others, themselves, and the human experience, in order to…

Arts & Culture
8
King County Sexual Assault Resource Center

KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…

—
9
Earthcorps

To cultivate leaders and community partnerships to advance environmental justice.

International
10
Life Science Washington

Life science washington is a non-profit trade and professional association dedicated to promoting innovation and responsible growth in the life sciences and biomedical industries in the state of washington. promotion and education are…

—
11
Healthpoint

Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.

Health
12
Seattle Jobs Initiative

Seattle jobs initiative (sji) creates opportunities for people to support themselves and their families through living-wage careers.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Leadership Tomorrow; the most unlike its peers is Seattle Indian Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
148/150
Grantees still filing
104/150
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,696,772 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $736,006 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTYDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $561,208 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCPRATHAM USA: $202,248 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USA+6 more: $37,126 · PhilanthropyFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,430,575 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTERUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $381,416 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONOVERLAKE MEDICAL CENTER: $170,000 · OtherIIT KANPUR FOUNDATION: $157,350 · OtherFOREST RIDGE SCHOOL: $132,000 · Other+120 more: $928,188 · Other+120 moreOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $187,921 · HealthTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM: $82,357 · HealthNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $68,650 · HealthMANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $38,000 · HealthSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $29,496 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,376 · Health+10 more: $36,755 · HealthGiddens School: $69,384 · EducationZeno: $45,544 · EducationAlliance for Education: $27,310 · EducationThe George Washington University: $18,500 · EducationRAINIER SCHOLARS: $11,500 · EducationAMERICAN PROGRESSIVE TELUGU ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · EducationGreen Dot Public Schools: $9,500 · EducationVILLAGEREACH: $8,000 · Education+9 more: $21,630 · EducationFARESTART: $183,500 · Employment+1 more: $5,000 · EmploymentSeeds For Progress Foundation Inc: $30,000 · InternationalUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES: $28,815 · InternationalKay Tita: $15,114 · InternationalPATH: $15,000 · InternationalKiran Anjali Project: $13,080 · InternationalCONSTRUCTION FOR CHANGE: $6,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $5,150 · International+5 more: $6,177 · InternationalRwanda Girls Initiative: $20,193 · Human ServicesOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $11,143 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $11,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $10,500 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHCARE: $8,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY DISTRICT SERVICE LEAGUE: $6,200 · Human ServicesUPLIFT NORTHWEST: $4,500 · Human ServicesFORGOTTEN CHILDRENS FUND: $4,405 · Human ServicesTHE SOPHIA WAY: $4,000 · Human Services+7 more: $6,799 · Human Services
Philanthropy$3,233,360Other$3,199,529Health$463,555Education$221,368Employment$188,500International$119,836Human Services$106,740

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $1,696,772 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,430,575 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $736,006 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $561,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $202,248 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $187,921 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFARESTART: $183,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM: $82,357 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGiddens School: $69,384 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORCARE HEALTH: $68,650 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDHAVEN: $55,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAPI CHAYA: $53,225 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMaris Place: $51,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetZeno: $45,544 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetMANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $38,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetSeeds For Progress Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $29,496 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES: $28,815 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $27,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Education: $27,310 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetGrist Magazine Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMPLIO NETWORK: $25,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $20,376 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRwanda Girls Initiative: $20,193 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY: $19,513 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION: $19,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe George Washington University: $18,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSolid Ground Washington: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE ART MUSEUM: $15,420 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPATH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetArts Corps: $13,242 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKiran Anjali Project: $13,080 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetBooger Fund: $12,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetBELONG Partners: $11,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRAINIER SCHOLARS: $11,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPEN ARMS PERINATAL SERVICES: $11,143 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $10,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGIRLS WHO CODE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SEATTLE WATERFRONT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING FAMILY SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVILLAGEREACH: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNISQUALLY LAND TRUST: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds OVERLAKE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FARESTART ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN CENTER FOR HEALTH & FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds Giddens School ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORCARE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
  • Who funds API CHAYA ↗
  • Who funds Maris Place ↗
  • Who funds Zeno ↗
  • Who funds MANJARI SANKURATHRI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Seeds For Progress Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds UPAYA SOCIAL VENTURES ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
  • Who funds Grist Magazine Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMPLIO NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Rwanda Girls Initiative ↗
  • Who funds THE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY FOR SEATTLEKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Kay Tita ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationThe Norcliffe Foundat…Puget Sound Energy Fo…United Way of King Co…Gates FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…Medina FoundationGrousemont FoundationM J Murdock Charitabl…Liberty Mutual Founda…Moccasin Lake Foundat…McKinstry Charitable …
Seattle FoundationWA72.9× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · United Way of King County · Gates Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Medina Foundation · Grousemont Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Moccasin Lake Foundation · McKinstry Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Satya and Rao Remala Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Satya and Rao Remala Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Satya and Rao Remala Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Satya and Rao Remala Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 239 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Satya and Rao Remala’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home