· Private foundation
Roth Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $217k
- $250k+2 grants · $750k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC | $250,000 |
| MY FRIEND'S PLACE | $100,000 |
| DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES | $65,000 |
| NORTH COUNTY LGBTQ RESOURCE CENTER | $51,667 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS | $20,000 |
| CALIBRATE | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL ARTS | $14,000 |
| THE ADVOT PROJECT | $10,000 |
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TAKING THE REINS | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CABRILLO MARINE AQUARIUM | $5,000 |
| WINGS OF RESCUE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $643k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES3× · 2017–2020 · $1.8M · revenue +86%
- CSCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · $685k · revenue +14%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES4× · 2019–2023 · $650k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- RLRED LEAF FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5.1M · revenue ×37
- VLVOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $525k · revenue -42%
- HOHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INCone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue -23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…
Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.
The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…
See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…
For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…
To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…
The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.
Arts for la leads communities, artists and organizations to advocate for an equitable, healthy, and creative los angeles region through the arts.
The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mayor's Fund for Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Red Leaf Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RED LEAF FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds VOTO LATINO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Jenesse Center Inc ↗
- Who funds LAMBDA LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds JOVENES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KCRW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE AMERICAN WAY ↗
- Who funds Social Impact Fund ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds Bellingham Festival of Music ↗
- Who funds DOCUMENTARY EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds North County LGBTQ Resource Center ↗
- Who funds STREET POETS INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOT ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Elevated Access Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds POWERPAC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds A Purposeful Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds TAKING THE REINS ↗
- Who funds RISE EDUCATION FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The California Endowment · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Roth Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Documentary Educational Resources Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Roth Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Roth Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.