Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Riordan Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$675k
Granted FY2024still arriving
47
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$1.0MHealth$852kHousing & Shelter$577kFood & Nutrition$519kInternational$386kEnvironment$347kEducation$325kReligion$198kOther$0
02FY2024 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $557k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC$50,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$45,000
GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION$30,000
LITERACY GREEN BAY INC$30,000
THE RIGHTWAY FOUNDATION$30,000
CASA$30,000
FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES$25,000
PAULS PANTRY$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$25,000
FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI$20,000
GOLDEN HOUSE$20,000
FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN - APPLETON FOOD BANK$20,000
CURATIVE CONNECTIONS$20,000
MUSIC FORWARD FOUNDATION$20,000
NAMI OSHKOSH INC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $50k → 14%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $45k → 8%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $35k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $20k → 10%MIND AND LIFE INSTITUTE: $20k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 10%MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE: $10k → 8%FATHER CARR'S PLACE: $30k → 11%FATHER CARR'S PLACE: $25k → 11%THE ROAD HOME: $10k → 10%FATHER CARR'S PLACE: $25k → 11%THE ROAD HOME: $7k → 10%FATHER CARR'S PLACE: $20k → 11%THE ROAD HOME: $5k → 10%GREEN LAKE COUNTY BASIC NEEDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%PATH: $20k → 14%YWCA MADISON: $5k → 10%PATH: $10k → 14%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $12k → 10%PATH (PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS): $3k → 14%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $10k → 10%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $8k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $10k → 10%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $25k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $20k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $15k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $15k → 14%UNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN: $20k → 10%FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%GOLDEN HOUSE: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
VA
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.1M · 60 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
26

Total granted

$4.1M
$335k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+4%

Still filing today

70%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $215k · revenue +650%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    7× · 2018–2024 · $210k · revenue +27%
  • NO
    Nami Oshkosh Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $170k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERNgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +41%
  • RT
    RAINFOREST TRUST
    one grant, 2022 · $35k · revenue +4%
  • TB
    THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +262%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

—
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
6
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
7
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
8
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
9
Goodwill Industries of South Central Wisconsin Inc

Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…

Employment
10
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
11
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
12
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Formidable Joy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…United Way AffiliatesCancer Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Development CentersAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr12%4%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr16%35%35–55yr19%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr16%40%35–55yr19%22%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/73
the rest of the field
8%
3,022/36,453

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
43/68
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION — $230,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATIONNami Oshkosh Inc — $170,000 · OtherNami Oshkosh IncLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $132,500 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKHOUSE OF HOPE — $125,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HOPENOTRE DAME DE LA BAIE ACADEMY INC — $125,000 · OtherNOTRE DAME DE LA BAIE ACADEMY INCFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $82,500 · Other+58 more — $1,129,500 · Other+58 moreMIND & LIFE INSTITUTE — $410,000 · Human ServicesMIND & LIFE INSTITUTEGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HOUSE INCFATHER CARRS PLACE 2-B LTD — $100,000 · Human ServicesFATHER CARRS PLACE 2-B L…THE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSIONTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $52,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC — $50,500 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $50,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO HISPANO INC — $49,500 · Human Services+4 more — $72,500 · Human Services+4 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $138,000 · InternationalInternatio…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · InternationalAMERICARES…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $60,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $35,000 · InternationalTHE UNION …RAINFOREST TRUST — $35,000 · InternationalRAINFOREST…CAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $15,000 · International+3 more — $22,500 · International+3 moreFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $160,000 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $112,500 · Housing & ShelterST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterPORCHLIGHT INC — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterGREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC — $215,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $97,000 · Environment+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $210,000 · HealthCOMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC — $52,500 · HealthGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $10,000 · HealthPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $131,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $97,500 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,994,500Human Services$1,024,500International$415,500Housing & Shelter$337,500Environment$322,000Health$302,500Food & Nutrition$258,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIND & LIFE INSTITUTE — $410,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetGREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC — $215,000 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $210,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNami Oshkosh Inc — $170,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $160,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC — $140,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $138,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $132,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC — $131,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC — $112,500 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFATHER CARRS PLACE 2-B LTD — $100,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC — $97,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $97,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $82,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY GREEN BAY INC — $55,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetLIVING COMPASSION — $54,500 over 7y, 16% of budgetCOMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC — $52,500 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC — $52,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC — $50,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO INC — $49,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC — $45,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetHollywood Schoolhouse Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEYE HEART WORLD INC — $38,500 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST — $35,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATH — $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORMIDABLE JOY — $32,500 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetUNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP — $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL LYME ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Rightway Foundation — $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANE COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of South Carolina Educational Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST WISCONSIN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPORCHLIGHT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIVENATIONORG FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Lake Renewal Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR RIPON MEDICAL CENTER INC — $11,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIND & LIFE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds GREEN LAKE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds Nami Oshkosh Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FATHER CARRS PLACE 2-B LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT MISSION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA EASTERN WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING COMPASSION ↗
  • Who funds COMBAT BLINDNESS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME DANE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO HISPANO INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EYE HEART WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds FORMIDABLE JOY ↗
  • Who funds UNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Greater Green Bay Com…John and Engrid Meng …George Kress Foundati…Wisconsin Public Serv…Community Foundation …K C Stock Foundation …Cornerstone Foundatio…Schneider National Fo…Otto Bremer TrustDe Pere Christian Out…Little Rapids Corpora…
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI40.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · John and Engrid Meng Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Riordan Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 102 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines