· Private foundation
Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION OF NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k39 grants · $111k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $461k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $800k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CURATIVE CONNECTIONS | $200,000 |
| CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY ICE CENTER | $100,000 |
| HSHS ST VINCENTST MARY'S FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ON BROADWAY INC | $100,000 |
| NOTRE DAME DE LA BAIE ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICES | $50,000 |
| ADULT TEEN CHALLENGE NORTHEASTERN WISCONSIN | $50,000 |
| BELLIN COLLEGE OF NURSING | $50,000 |
| NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC | $40,000 |
| CEREBRAL PALSY INC | $40,000 |
| ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING | $40,000 |
| FOUNDATION HEALTH AND WHOLENESS | $35,000 |
| UW-GREEN BAY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| GREEN BAY ACTION SPORTS ORGANIZATION | $26,057 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $475k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $449k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD2× · 2021–2024 · $201k · revenue +32%
- EEEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY4× · 2021–2024 · $120k · revenue +25%
- FHFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $112k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- GHGOLDEN HOUSE INCone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -15%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $50k
- EPEINSTEIN PROJECT INCone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +13%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Innovative services, inc. (isi) cares for those with disabilities, helping them lead fulfilling lives with maximum independence. innovative's vision is to be the most trusted care provider for people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
Goodwill of south central wisconsin's mission is to help people in our community to live, work and thrive through housing, employment and supportive services. see schedule o for continuationsupported employment and job skills training are…
Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.
House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…
New community shelter foundation, inc. is organized and operated for charitable, educational, religious, and scientific purposes exclusively for the benefit and support of the greater green bay community foundation, inc.
Dgbi works to revitalize the social and economic climate of downtown green bay.
The wisconsin council of the blind and visually impaired's mission is to promote the dignity and empowerment of people in wisconsin who are blind and visually impaired by providing services, advocating legislation, and educating the…
Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mandolin Foundation Limited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WISCONSIN BEER DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION INC C/O THE KAMMER GR ↗
- Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY CLINIC LTD ↗
- Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds ON BROADWAY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRO INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
- Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE FOX CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF NORTHEAST WI INC ↗
- Who funds EINSTEIN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
- Who funds BRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds EXPERIENCE GREATER GREEN BAY INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · George Kress Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · John and Engrid Meng Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Bernard E and Alyce G Dahlin Foundation Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc?
Find your warmest path to Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.